Skip to content
Ice Lab

Right wing · #22

Matt Bradley

Washington Capitals Florida Panthers(traded during the season)
Age
48
Shoots
Right
Height
191 cm
Weight
91 kg
Born
Stittsville, CAN
Draft
1996, round 4, #102 (SJS)

Career · 2009–10 to 2011–12

Games
183
Goals
17
Points
43
TOI per game
10:49
xGF% (5v5)
45.6%
Goals above expected
−0.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10WSH77101424+611:029810.2%09.4–
2010–11WSH614711−310:29586.9%05.450.6%
2011–12FLA45358−310:52358.6%02.837.7%
Total2 teams183172643010:491918.9%017.645.6%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.50.620406080100120140160180
8m10m12m14m16m20406080100120140160180Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2011–12 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

4th line

16th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.5229th pct
  • Assists /600.7935th pct
  • ixG /600.5319th pct
  • Goals above expected−0.650th pct

Play-driving

4th line
  • xGF% (5v5)45.6%19th pct
  • CF% (5v5)45.5%15th pct
  • Relative xGF%−5.814th pct
  • Penalty diff /600.1862nd pct

Usage

4th line
  • TOI per game10:4919th pct
  • PP time share1.9%15th pct
  • Offensive zone starts55.8%45th pct
  • Quality of competition23.6%27th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Bradley wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2011–12, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 610+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

40.3%

27–40 · below the 610 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

40.7%

Opponents won 50.4% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.6% against them.

Wins above average

−6

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

1.4

67 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

30%10 · +5.933%6 · +3.840%25 · +2.40%1 · –67%3 · +4.875%4 · +11.633%6 · +18.650%2 · +1.340%10 · −3.8Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone40.0% 12–18
  • Neutral zone41.7% 10–14
  • Defensive zone38.5% 5–8

By strength

  • Even strength41.8% 23–32
  • Power play50.0% 1–1
  • Shorthanded33.3% 3–6

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +30 after a win, −10 after a loss. Each win was worth 3.0 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–102839.3%40.0%
2010–111136.4%35.2%
2011–122842.9%43.5%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−0.6 goals above expected

0510152020406080100120140160180Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80