Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
48
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
96 kg
Born
Rakovnik, CZE
Draft
1996, round 8, #204 (TOR)

Career · 2009–10 to 2012–13

Games
246
Goals
14
Points
130
TOI per game
20:33
xGF% (5v5)
47.0%
Goals above expected
−5.8

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10TOR8274249−1622:211584.4%257.4–
2010–11TOR5833538−222:28993.0%215.349.4%
2010–11BOS24189+621:15313.2%31.846.7%
2010–11All teams8244347+422:071303.1%247.148.6%
2011–12CAR29099−1219:15380.0%42.446.1%
2011–12MTL4331922−616:41496.1%122.441.1%
2011–12All teams7232831−1817:43873.4%164.843.3%
2012–13MTL10033+413:33110.0%00.559.3%
Total4 teams24614116130−2620:333863.6%6519.847.0%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.511.550100150200
12m14m16m18m20m22m24m26m50100150200Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2012–13 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

50th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st pair
  • Goals /600.1750th pct
  • Assists /601.3899th pct
  • ixG /600.2475th pct
  • Shots /604.5874th pct

Play-driving

3rd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)47.0%24th pct
  • CF% (5v5)48.8%39th pct
  • Relative xGF%−0.350th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.4130th pct

Usage

2nd pair
  • TOI per game20:3367th pct
  • PP time share62.1%93rd pct
  • PK time share3.5%4th pct
  • Quality of competition24.0%33rd pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−5.8 goals above expected

0510152050100150200Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−15−10−50+5+10+15+20