Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #80

Nik Antropov

Atlanta Thrashers Winnipeg Jets(traded during the season)
Age
46
Shoots
Left
Height
198 cm
Weight
111 kg
Born
Ust-Kamenogorsk, KAZ
Draft
1998, round 1, #10 (TOR)

Career · 2009–10 to 2012–13

Games
152
Goals
40
Points
108
TOI per game
16:56
xGF% (5v5)
45.0%
Goals above expected
+10.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10ATL76244367+1318:1412619.0%1916.5–
2010–11ATL76162541−1715:3910515.2%1613.045.0%
2011–12WPG69152035016:319515.8%1011.747.6%
2012–13WPG4061218+615:575610.7%35.448.4%
Total2 teams26161100161+216:4138216.0%4846.646.7%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.511.520406080100120140
14m15m16m17m18m19m20m20406080100120140Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2012–13 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd line

55th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st line
  • Goals /600.8470th pct
  • Assists /601.3885th pct
  • ixG /600.6437th pct
  • Goals above expected+14.494th pct

Play-driving

4th line
  • xGF% (5v5)46.7%27th pct
  • CF% (5v5)48.4%39th pct
  • Relative xGF%−2.731st pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.3212th pct

Usage

2nd line
  • TOI per game16:4174th pct
  • PP time share43.0%74th pct
  • Offensive zone starts63.7%73rd pct
  • Quality of competition24.5%59th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Antropov wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2012–13, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 727+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

44.3%

1147–1445 · #165 of 179 regulars, 8th percentile

Against an average centre

44.6%

Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.

Wins above average

−141

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

10.2

2,592 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

45%521 · +0.345%601 · +1.642%338 · +0.753%118 · +0.940%103 · +0.151%115 · +2.038%136 · +2.245%394 · +1.543%266 · +0.6Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone43.8% 412–529
  • Neutral zone44.9% 446–547
  • Defensive zone43.9% 289–369

By strength

  • Even strength44.7% 939–1164
  • Power play45.1% 166–202
  • Shorthanded37.9% 36–59

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +14 after a win, −8 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–10110243.2%43.6%
2010–1153448.7%48.8%
2011–1265243.4%43.7%
2012–1330442.1%42.6%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+10.6 goals above expected

01020304020406080100120140Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80