- Age
- 43
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 193 cm
- Weight
- 95 kg
- Born
- Boston, USA
- Draft
- 2002, round 1, #5 (PIT)
Career · 2009–10 to 2013–14
- Games
- 208
- Goals
- 16
- Points
- 99
- TOI per game
- 22:38
- xGF% (5v5)
- 43.1%
- Goals above expected
- −0.7
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2009–10 |   ANA | 62 | 4 | 24 | 28 | −6 | 24:34 | 107 | 3.7% | 13 | 6.2 | – |
| 2009–10 |   EDM | 19 | 3 | 8 | 11 | +7 | 25:23 | 44 | 6.8% | 4 | 2.7 | – |
| 2009–10 | All teams | 81 | 7 | 32 | 39 | +1 | 24:45 | 151 | 4.6% | 17 | 8.9 | – |
| 2010–11 | EDM | 35 | 2 | 25 | 27 | +13 | 25:20 | 43 | 4.7% | 7 | 3.1 | 41.9% |
| 2011–12 | EDM | 51 | 3 | 17 | 20 | −16 | 20:58 | 41 | 7.3% | 10 | 2.9 | 44.8% |
| 2012–13 | EDM | 34 | 4 | 9 | 13 | −7 | 18:29 | 30 | 13.3% | 7 | 1.4 | 40.5% |
| 2013–14 |   FLA | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −7 | 16:45 | 8 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.3 | 49.1% |
| Total | 3 teams | 208 | 16 | 83 | 99 | −16 | 22:38 | 273 | 5.9% | 41 | 16.7 | 43.1% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2013–14 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
3rd pair
29th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.
- 1st pair
- 2nd pair
- 3rd pair
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
2nd pair- Goals /600.2064th pct
- Assists /601.0691st pct
- ixG /600.2168th pct
- Shots /603.4843rd pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)43.1%4th pct
- CF% (5v5)42.9%2nd pct
- Relative xGF%−2.230th pct
- xGA /60 (lower is better)2.823rd pct
Usage
2nd pair- TOI per game22:3886th pct
- PP time share53.5%88th pct
- PK time share20.9%33rd pct
- Quality of competition24.4%58th pct
Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−0.7 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games