Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #46

Jakub Kindl

Detroit Red Wings Florida Panthers(traded during the season)
Age
39
Shoots
Left
Height
191 cm
Weight
90 kg
Born
Sumperk, CZE
Draft
2005, round 1, #19 (DET)

Career · 2009–10 to 2016–17

Games
331
Goals
16
Points
74
TOI per game
15:36
xGF% (5v5)
50.9%
Goals above expected
−2.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10DET3000−210:5010.0%00.1–
2010–11DET48224−613:37623.2%02.149.0%
2011–12DET5511213+714:03691.4%12.251.7%
2012–13DET414913+1518:33765.3%33.554.6%
2013–14DET6621719−417:14932.2%74.349.3%
2014–15DET355813+215:55549.3%72.556.5%
2015–16DET25246+316:28375.4%01.850.8%
2015–16FLA19022+1013:59260.0%10.954.6%
2015–16All teams44268+1315:23633.2%12.652.5%
2016–17FLA39044−1114:41410.0%01.243.9%
Total2 teams331165874+1415:364593.5%1918.650.9%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.850100150200250300
10m12m14m16m18m20m22m50100150200250300Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd pair

68th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair
  • Goals /600.1959th pct
  • Assists /600.6763rd pct
  • ixG /600.2268th pct
  • Shots /605.3385th pct

Play-driving

2nd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)50.9%67th pct
  • CF% (5v5)53.0%90th pct
  • Relative xGF%−0.944th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.1868th pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game15:3623rd pct
  • PP time share22.1%61st pct
  • PK time share2.9%5th pct
  • Quality of competition22.9%3rd pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−2.6 goals above expected

0510152050100150200250300Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30+40+50