Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
33
Shoots
Right
Height
183 cm
Weight
88 kg
Born
Niagara Falls, USA
Draft
2011, round 2, #36 (CHI)

Career · 2014–15 to 2018–19

Games
91
Goals
4
Points
24
TOI per game
15:17
xGF% (5v5)
47.6%
Goals above expected
−0.1

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2014–15CHI4112+113:10250.0%20.227.9%
2014–15VAN17022+117:27150.0%10.745.4%
2014–15All teams21134+216:38175.9%30.942.8%
2015–16PIT9011+313:08110.0%00.251.1%
2015–16EDM20156+315:33323.1%01.447.0%
2015–16All teams29167+614:48432.3%01.648.1%
2016–17NYR322911+315:19385.3%21.354.2%
2017–18ARI5022−115:5640.0%00.236.0%
2018–19CBJ4000+110:3930.0%00.138.0%
Total7 teams9142024+1115:171053.8%54.147.6%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.50.6102030405060708090
13m14m15m16m17m18m102030405060708090Game

Player card

How 2014–15 to 2018–19 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd pair

39th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair
  • Goals /600.1752nd pct
  • Assists /600.8680th pct
  • ixG /600.1841st pct
  • Shots /604.5362nd pct

Play-driving

3rd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)47.6%28th pct
  • CF% (5v5)51.1%70th pct
  • Relative xGF%−0.747th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.5319th pct

Usage

3rd pair
  • TOI per game15:1720th pct
  • PP time share25.6%68th pct
  • PK time share3.3%11th pct
  • Quality of competition23.8%38th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−0.1 goals above expected

0123420406080Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30