- Age
- 42
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 183 cm
- Weight
- 93 kg
- Born
- Kitimat, CAN
- Draft
- Undrafted
Career · 2009–10 to 2011–12
- Games
- 189
- Goals
- 7
- Points
- 23
- TOI per game
- 9:23
- xGF% (5v5)
- 44.9%
- Goals above expected
- −8.5
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2011–12 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
4th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.246th pct
- Assists /600.5414th pct
- ixG /600.5217th pct
- Goals above expected−8.510th pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)44.9%17th pct
- CF% (5v5)45.2%13th pct
- Relative xGF%−6.811th pct
- Penalty diff /600.0042nd pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game9:2310th pct
- PP time share3.0%22nd pct
- Offensive zone starts43.3%18th pct
- Quality of competition22.9%12th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Pelley wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2011–12, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 610+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
50.8%
391–379 · #79 of 179 regulars, 56th percentile
Against an average centre
51.0%
Opponents won 50.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.8% against them.
Wins above average
+7
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
5.7
770 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone49.1% 110–114
- Neutral zone51.3% 139–132
- Defensive zone51.6% 142–133
By strength
- Even strength51.1% 322–308
- Power play23.1% 3–10
- Shorthanded50.8% 60–58
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +9 after a win, −13 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.2 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Tim Brent61.1% 11–7
- Blair Betts47.1% 8–9
- Marty Reasoner58.8% 10–7
- Sidney Crosby52.9% 9–8
- Brian Boyle62.5% 10–6
- Brandon Dubinsky50.0% 8–8
- Ryan Kesler81.8% 9–2
- Erik Christensen80.0% 8–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 196 | 49.5% | 49.1% |
| 2010–11 | 320 | 52.8% | 53.5% |
| 2011–12 | 254 | 49.2% | 49.2% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−8.5 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games