Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #37

Tim Brent

Age
42
Shoots
Right
Height
183 cm
Weight
85 kg
Born
Cambridge, CAN
Draft
2004, round 3, #75 (ANA)

Career · 2009–10 to 2012–13

Games
189
Goals
20
Points
47
TOI per game
11:03
xGF% (5v5)
41.0%
Goals above expected
+5.4

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10TOR1000013:2130.0%00.1–
2010–11TOR7981220−411:396013.3%45.338.8%
2011–12CAR79121224−810:537116.9%77.639.9%
2012–13CAR30033−39:48230.0%21.651.1%
Total2 teams189202747−1511:0315712.7%1314.641.0%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.50.620406080100120140160180
8m10m12m14m16m20406080100120140160180Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2012–13 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

Extra / AHL

13th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

3rd line
  • Goals /600.5738th pct
  • Assists /600.7835th pct
  • ixG /600.426th pct
  • Goals above expected+5.481st pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)41.0%5th pct
  • CF% (5v5)43.9%8th pct
  • Relative xGF%−7.68th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.2019th pct

Usage

4th line
  • TOI per game11:0322nd pct
  • PP time share19.8%50th pct
  • Offensive zone starts49.2%29th pct
  • Quality of competition22.8%10th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Brent wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2012–13, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 727+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

50.8%

816–791 · #77 of 179 regulars, 57th percentile

Against an average centre

51.1%

Opponents won 50.4% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.6% against them.

Wins above average

+18

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

8.5

1,607 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

51%230 · +1.251%189 · +0.354%275 · +1.757%60 · +0.952%64 · +0.340%73 · +1.248%75 · +1.751%273 · +1.750%368 · +1.4Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone52.6% 244–220
  • Neutral zone49.5% 248–253
  • Defensive zone50.5% 324–318

By strength

  • Even strength50.2% 623–619
  • Power play58.2% 53–38
  • Shorthanded51.7% 138–129

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +6 after a win, −19 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–10850.0%52.4%
2010–1178852.0%52.4%
2011–1257148.7%49.0%
2012–1324051.7%52.0%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+5.4 goals above expected

0510152020406080100120140160180Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80