Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
39
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
87 kg
Born
Edmonton, CAN
Draft
Undrafted

Career · 2009–10 to 2018–19

Games
20
Goals
1
Points
4
TOI per game
18:07
xGF% (5v5)
47.0%
Goals above expected
+0.4

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10PHX17145+117:49195.3%21.1–
2010–11PHX4341014+816:02478.5%52.651.8%
2011–12PHX4611011+718:21581.7%02.145.9%
2012–13PHX30156+817:13352.9%02.147.0%
2013–14PHX48189+216:24611.6%32.352.3%
2014–15ARI20134−518:07244.2%20.647.0%
2014–15DAL5000014:2560.0%00.337.0%
2014–15CGY19000+612:39150.0%00.462.0%
2014–15All teams44134+115:20452.2%21.450.4%
2015–16NJD6761319−2218:391045.8%125.048.7%
2016–17SJS6221618+416:451181.7%35.554.4%
2017–18MTL37145+318:04382.6%21.854.3%
2018–19MTL18022−119:51290.0%21.152.9%
Total7 teams412187593+1117:185543.2%3125.050.8%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.050.10.150.20.250.30.35101214161820
16m17m18m19m101214161820Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2018–19 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

1st pair

76th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd pair
  • Goals /600.1544th pct
  • Assists /600.6355th pct
  • ixG /600.2164th pct
  • Shots /604.6671st pct

Play-driving

1st pair
  • xGF% (5v5)50.8%68th pct
  • CF% (5v5)50.8%70th pct
  • Relative xGF%+1.675th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.2268th pct

Usage

2nd pair
  • TOI per game17:1845th pct
  • PP time share24.8%66th pct
  • PK time share25.0%48th pct
  • Quality of competition23.9%37th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+0.4 goals above expected

00.20.40.60.815101520Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60