- Age
- 38
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 188 cm
- Weight
- 86 kg
- Born
- Riga, LVA
- Draft
- 2008, round 1, #28 (PHX)
2015–16
- Games
- 50
- Goals
- 3
- Points
- 6
- TOI per game
- 11:26
- xGF% (5v5)
- 47.8%
- Goals above expected
- −3.3
Season
The regular-season line, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How this season compares with everyone else at the position, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
21st percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.3113th pct
- Assists /600.318th pct
- ixG /600.6641st pct
- Goals above expected−3.318th pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)47.8%35th pct
- CF% (5v5)45.1%11th pct
- Relative xGF%+3.380th pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.1033rd pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game11:2617th pct
- PP time share11.4%37th pct
- Offensive zone starts54.4%43rd pct
- Quality of competition24.2%49th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Tikhonov wins the draw this season, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 205+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
38.8%
45–71 · below the 205 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
38.6%
Opponents won 49.8% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.2% against them.
Wins above average
−13
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
5.5
116 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone43.4% 23–30
- Neutral zone38.5% 15–24
- Defensive zone29.2% 7–17
By strength
- Even strength39.8% 39–59
- Power play33.3% 6–12
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +18 after a win, −15 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.4 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Charlie Coyle62.5% 5–3
- Nicholas Shore62.5% 5–3
- Peter Holland50.0% 3–3
- Anze Kopitar33.3% 2–4
- Mathieu Perreault16.7% 1–5
- Mikko Koivu0.0% 0–5
- Jordan Staal50.0% 2–2
- Phillip Danault75.0% 3–1
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−3.3 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games