Skip to content
Ice Lab

Defence · #25 · Rookie

Philip Samuelsson

Pittsburgh Penguins Arizona Coyotes(traded during the season)
Age
35
Shoots
Left
Height
188 cm
Weight
88 kg
Born
Leksand, SWE
Draft
2009, round 2, #61 (PIT)

Career · 2013–14 to 2015–16

Games
13
Goals
0
Points
0
TOI per game
16:04
xGF% (5v5)
51.2%
Goals above expected
−0.3

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2013–14PIT5000−115:3450.0%00.145.9%
2014–15ARI4000−316:5340.0%00.146.3%
2015–16ARI4000015:5350.0%00.161.7%
Total2 teams13000−416:04140.0%00.351.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
-0.00500.0050.010.0150.020.0250.031010.51111.51212.513
16m16m17m17m1010.51111.51212.513Game

Player card

How 2013–14 to 2015–16 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd pair

44th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st pair
  2. 2nd pair
  3. 3rd pair
  4. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.005th pct
  • Assists /600.000th pct
  • ixG /600.097th pct
  • Shots /604.0254th pct

Play-driving

2nd pair
  • xGF% (5v5)51.2%70th pct
  • CF% (5v5)48.0%31st pct
  • Relative xGF%+5.297th pct
  • xGA /60 (lower is better)2.1961st pct

Usage

3rd pair
  • TOI per game16:0427th pct
  • PP time share1.2%13th pct
  • PK time share29.6%49th pct
  • Quality of competition24.8%85th pct

Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−0.3 goals above expected

00.10.20.324681012Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−100+10+20+30