Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
35
Shoots
Right
Height
188 cm
Weight
95 kg
Born
Denver, USA
Draft
2009, round 2, #44 (FLA)

Career · 6 seasons

Games
98
Goals
9
Points
26
TOI per game
13:25
xGF% (5v5)
50.2%
Goals above expected
−5.0

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2012–13FLA4331013−1015:48963.1%310.159.1%
2013–14FLA24527−112:002321.7%12.042.1%
2014–15CGY11123−510:40137.7%00.833.7%
2015–16CGY2011014:0030.0%00.134.6%
2016–17VAN14022−311:58110.0%00.935.0%
After a break: 2020–21CAR4000−18:3030.0%00.216.3%
Total4 teams9891726−2013:251496.0%414.050.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.820406080
10m12m14m16m18m20406080Game

Player card

How 6 seasons compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd line

44th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.4122nd pct
  • Assists /600.7842nd pct
  • ixG /600.6442nd pct
  • Goals above expected−5.018th pct

Play-driving

2nd line
  • xGF% (5v5)50.2%61st pct
  • CF% (5v5)51.1%70th pct
  • Relative xGF%+4.190th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.2320th pct

Usage

3rd line
  • TOI per game13:2547th pct
  • PP time share13.0%42nd pct
  • Offensive zone starts61.3%65th pct
  • Quality of competition23.9%47th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Shore wins the draw over 6 seasons, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1068+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

46.2%

372–434 · below the 1068 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

46.5%

Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.

Wins above average

−29

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

8.8

806 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

49%144 · +1.349%144 · +3.142%159 · +2.548%46 · −0.854%37 · +0.650%30 · +1.046%46 · +0.842%98 · +4.246%102 · −0.1Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone44.7% 135–167
  • Neutral zone48.8% 148–155
  • Defensive zone44.3% 89–112

By strength

  • Even strength45.7% 319–379
  • Power play54.7% 29–24
  • Shorthanded43.6% 24–31

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +19 after a win, −14 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.8 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2012–1344347.9%48.2%
2013–1420841.3%41.7%
2014–155949.2%50.3%
2015–161040.0%41.1%
2016–177153.5%53.3%
2020–211520.0%18.6%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−5.0 goals above expected

05101520406080Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−40−200+20+40+60