- Age
- 38
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 193 cm
- Weight
- 90 kg
- Born
- Stockholm, SWE
- Draft
- Undrafted
Career · 2010–11 to 2011–12
- Games
- 15
- Goals
- 0
- Points
- 0
- TOI per game
- 7:02
- xGF% (5v5)
- 43.3%
- Goals above expected
- −0.5
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2010–11 to 2011–12 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
2nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.000th pct
- Assists /600.000th pct
- ixG /600.261st pct
- Goals above expected−0.550th pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)43.3%10th pct
- CF% (5v5)48.0%33rd pct
- Relative xGF%−9.83rd pct
- Penalty diff /60-1.142nd pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game7:023rd pct
- PP time share–
- Offensive zone starts44.4%20th pct
- Quality of competition22.8%9th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.
Most similar players this season
Needs a regular role to compare.
Faceoffs
How often Engqvist wins the draw over 2010–11 to 2011–12, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 407+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
39.2%
31–48 · below the 407 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
39.4%
Opponents won 50.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.8% against them.
Wins above average
−8
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
5.3
79 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone37.9% 11–18
- Neutral zone27.8% 5–13
- Defensive zone46.9% 15–17
By strength
- Even strength37.9% 25–41
- Shorthanded46.2% 6–7
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +6 after a win, −4 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.2 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Paul Gaustad25.0% 2–6
- Peter Regin66.7% 4–2
- Bryan Little66.7% 4–2
- Justin Abdelkader16.7% 1–5
- Mark Letestu0.0% 0–4
- Mikhail Grabovski0.0% 0–3
- Paul Stastny33.3% 1–2
- Ryan Shannon50.0% 1–1
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010–11 | 19 | 36.8% | 33.2% |
| 2011–12 | 60 | 40.0% | 41.4% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−0.5 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games