
- Age
- 33
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 191 cm
- Weight
- 86 kg
- Born
- Chelyabinsk, RUS
- Draft
- 2012, round 4, #121 (LAK)
2019–20
- Games
- 43
- Goals
- 4
- Points
- 14
- TOI per game
- 12:06
- xGF% (5v5)
- 48.4%
- Goals above expected
- −2.2
Season
The regular-season line, by team for traded players.
| 2019–20 | 43 | 4 | 10 | 14 | −6 | 12:06 | 63 | 6.3% | 2 | 6.2 | 48.4% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How this season compares with everyone else at the position, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
28th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
4th line- Goals /600.4617th pct
- Assists /601.1564th pct
- ixG /600.7139th pct
- Goals above expected−2.225th pct
Play-driving
3rd line- xGF% (5v5)48.4%36th pct
- CF% (5v5)52.7%79th pct
- Relative xGF%−2.430th pct
- Penalty diff /600.2362nd pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game12:0620th pct
- PP time share13.8%34th pct
- Offensive zone starts62.7%62nd pct
- Quality of competition22.9%2nd pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Prokhorkin wins the draw this season, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 173+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
47.6%
101–111 · #112 of 169 regulars, 34th percentile
Against an average centre
46.8%
Opponents won 49.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.8% against them.
Wins above average
−7
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
5.9
212 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone48.9% 45–47
- Neutral zone50.8% 32–31
- Defensive zone42.1% 24–33
By strength
- Even strength47.8% 97–106
- Power play44.4% 4–5
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +35 after a win, −20 after a loss. Each win was worth 3.4 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Victor Rask75.0% 6–2
- Riley Sheahan33.3% 2–4
- Brandon Sutter40.0% 2–3
- Christoffer Ehn40.0% 2–3
- Tobias Rieder80.0% 4–1
- Tyler Bozak60.0% 3–2
- Nick Paul20.0% 1–4
- Jay Beagle25.0% 1–3
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−2.2 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games