Western Conference · Pacific Division
Arizona Coyotes
2015–16·35–39–8·78 points·4th in the Pacific, 10th in the Western
- Points
- 78#24
- Goal differential
- −36#27
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 45.2%#28
- Power play
- 17.7%#20
- Penalty kill
- 77.3%#28
- GSAx
- −21.4#27
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Coyotes. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 75 | 21 | 34 | 55 | −6 | 24:46 | 228 | 9.2% | 27 | 12.2 | +8.8 | 51.3% | |
| 81 | 18 | 34 | 52 | +3 | 16:22 | 156 | 11.5% | 15 | 16.3 | +1.7 | 46.2% | |
| 72 | 28 | 19 | 47 | +4 | 17:36 | 170 | 16.5% | 17 | 20.4 | +7.6 | 46.7% | |
| 81 | 20 | 24 | 44 | +12 | 14:23 | 105 | 19.0% | 12 | 16.2 | +3.8 | 49.1% | |
| 64 | 13 | 28 | 41 | −5 | 17:48 | 141 | 9.2% | 13 | 18.4 | −5.4 | 48.5% | |
| 62 | 13 | 26 | 39 | −28 | 18:39 | 144 | 9.0% | 18 | 13.4 | −0.4 | 43.8% | |
| 76 | 17 | 21 | 38 | −14 | 16:38 | 123 | 13.8% | 16 | 14.0 | +3.0 | 44.1% | |
| 82 | 14 | 23 | 37 | −21 | 17:18 | 189 | 7.4% | 8 | 17.7 | −3.7 | 47.1% | |
| 75 | 6 | 30 | 36 | −10 | 22:28 | 161 | 3.7% | 14 | 6.4 | −0.4 | 45.0% | |
| 82 | 11 | 20 | 31 | +8 | 15:37 | 117 | 9.4% | 0 | 12.5 | −1.5 | 44.7% | |
| 81 | 9 | 15 | 24 | −9 | 15:11 | 109 | 8.3% | 1 | 12.1 | −3.1 | 45.6% | |
| 78 | 6 | 11 | 17 | +5 | 20:31 | 101 | 5.9% | 3 | 4.0 | +2.0 | 48.0% | |
| 18 | 4 | 9 | 13 | +5 | 15:09 | 22 | 18.2% | 4 | 2.0 | +2.0 | 44.7% | |
| 70 | 4 | 8 | 12 | −10 | 10:14 | 47 | 8.5% | 1 | 4.7 | −0.7 | 43.4% | |
| 38 | 4 | 5 | 9 | −3 | 17:33 | 65 | 6.2% | 1 | 2.0 | +2.0 | 39.3% | |
| 71 | 2 | 6 | 8 | −5 | 15:44 | 64 | 3.1% | 0 | 1.7 | +0.3 | 40.5% | |
| 58 | 3 | 4 | 7 | −3 | 17:47 | 42 | 7.1% | 0 | 1.5 | +1.5 | 43.6% | |
| 70 | 2 | 5 | 7 | +3 | 17:01 | 69 | 2.9% | 0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 41.5% | |
| 26 | 3 | 3 | 6 | +1 | 9:00 | 22 | 13.6% | 0 | 1.5 | +1.5 | 41.2% | |
| 19 | 2 | 4 | 6 | −2 | 14:14 | 35 | 5.7% | 0 | 1.7 | +0.3 | 41.9% | |
| 39 | 3 | 3 | 6 | −6 | 11:46 | 30 | 10.0% | 2 | 4.9 | −1.9 | 42.9% | |
| 65 | 2 | 2 | 4 | −7 | 12:12 | 53 | 3.8% | 0 | 4.5 | −2.5 | 44.0% | |
| 14 | 1 | 2 | 3 | −2 | 10:36 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 0.5 | +0.5 | 42.3% | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +2 | 11:24 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 0.3 | +0.7 | 34.1% | |
| 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | −4 | 11:30 | 9 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.7 | −0.7 | 42.2% | |
| 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6:18 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.2 | −0.2 | 44.2% | |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 10:05 | 13 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.9 | −0.9 | 40.0% | |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11:19 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 0.7 | +0.3 | 43.2% | |
| 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10:22 | 9 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.7 | −0.7 | 40.4% | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 6:13 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 69.2% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 39 | 36 | 15 | 18 | 5 | .912 | 2.75 | 2 | −5.9 | .647 | |
| 32 | 32 | 15 | 13 | 2 | .916 | 2.63 | 3 | −1.9 | .732 | |
| 19 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | .894 | 3.11 | 0 | −10.3 | .727 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .750 | 6.04 | 0 | −3.2 | .333 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
Backup
20th percentile among qualified goalies, blending goaltending 75%, usage 25%.
- Starter
- Backup
- Third string / AHL
Goaltending
Backup- Save %.91232nd pct
- GSAx−5.922nd pct
- GSAx /60-0.1622nd pct
- High-danger SV%.6478th pct
- Medium-danger SV%.88575th pct
- Low-danger SV%.96335th pct
- Rebound control−1.2011th pct
- GAA (lower is better)2.7525th pct
Usage
Backup- Games started3644th pct
- Shots faced /6031.0680th pct
- xG faced /602.5959th pct
Percentiles among goalies with 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.