Skip to content
Ice Lab

Eastern Conference · Atlantic Division

Buffalo Sabres

2025–26·50–23–9·109 points·1st in the Atlantic, 2nd in the Eastern·Clinched division

Points
109#4
Goal differential
+43#5
xGF% (5v5, adj.)
50.8%#14
Power play
19.5%#21
Penalty kill
81.9%#4
GSAx
+16.4#6

Shot maps

Model-based

Where the team creates chances and where it gives them up, against the league. Start with the goals; switch to high-danger chances or every shot.

Where the chances come from

Shading: where the team shoots (left) and allows shots (right) more or less than the league average at 5-on-5, per 60 minutes. Dots: the shots picked above. Hover a dot for details; click to open the game.

Goal Saved MissedBigger marks were better chances (higher xG).

For283 shots · 283 goals · 46.1 xG

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(blue is good: more shots for)

Against240 shots · 240 goals · 39.6 xG

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(red is bad: more shots against)

Faceoffs by dot

Win rate at each of the nine dots, from the team's point of view. The second number is the expected-goal swing per faceoff (in hundredths of a goal) between winning and losing there.

49%887 · +1.047%917 · +1.240%610 · +1.839%156 · +0.944%161 · +0.357%118 · +0.636%137 · +1.051%684 · +2.243%1012 · +1.3Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Quality or quantity?

Model-based

Every skater with 200+ minutes. Some shoot often from anywhere; others wait for the good chance. The dashed curves join equal expected goals per 60.

Shot quality against shot volume

All situations. Right is more shots, up is better chances.

246810121416180.0200.0400.0600.0800.1000.120Unblocked attempts per 60 (quantity) →↑ xG per attempt (quality)0.3 xG/600.4 xG/600.5 xG/600.7 xG/600.8 xG/60Few, dangerous chancesLots of dangerous chancesFew, weak chancesLots of weak chancesNorrisZuckerKrebsQuinnMalenstynMcLeodThompsonTuchDoanByramTimminsSamuelssonDahlinBrysonKozakPowerDunneBensonMetsaOstlundKesselringGreenwayRosenStanley