Western Conference · Pacific Division
Los Angeles Kings
2022–23·47–25–10·104 points·3rd in the Pacific, 5th in the Western·Clinched playoff spot
- Points
- 104#10
- Goal differential
- +20#14
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 52.9%#8
- Power play
- 25.3%#4
- Penalty kill
- 75.8%#24
- GSAx
- −20.6#25
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Kings. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 82 | 28 | 46 | 74 | +20 | 20:18 | 169 | 16.6% | 20 | 20.3 | +7.7 | 53.4% | |
| 69 | 23 | 49 | 72 | +2 | 17:36 | 208 | 11.1% | 24 | 28.1 | −5.1 | 53.7% | |
| 82 | 41 | 26 | 67 | +22 | 18:45 | 250 | 16.4% | 20 | 28.0 | +13.0 | 52.9% | |
| 77 | 26 | 33 | 59 | −4 | 17:06 | 228 | 11.4% | 25 | 26.0 | 0.0 | 54.7% | |
| 82 | 18 | 36 | 54 | −8 | 18:20 | 152 | 11.8% | 20 | 17.5 | +0.5 | 54.1% | |
| 81 | 9 | 43 | 52 | +12 | 26:14 | 145 | 6.2% | 27 | 8.9 | +0.1 | 53.1% | |
| 63 | 23 | 18 | 41 | +10 | 15:36 | 122 | 18.9% | 9 | 16.6 | +6.4 | 56.6% | |
| 72 | 9 | 29 | 38 | −12 | 19:47 | 110 | 8.2% | 16 | 5.5 | +3.5 | 50.6% | |
| 59 | 14 | 22 | 36 | +14 | 16:18 | 133 | 10.5% | 8 | 13.7 | +0.3 | 53.0% | |
| 81 | 11 | 23 | 34 | +11 | 12:57 | 108 | 10.2% | 0 | 12.2 | −1.2 | 54.2% | |
| 59 | 10 | 19 | 29 | −2 | 16:59 | 163 | 6.1% | 7 | 16.8 | −6.8 | 54.8% | |
| 56 | 13 | 15 | 28 | −5 | 11:41 | 122 | 10.7% | 12 | 13.2 | −0.2 | 50.2% | |
| 82 | 9 | 17 | 26 | +8 | 18:47 | 135 | 6.7% | 0 | 6.3 | +2.7 | 54.3% | |
| 53 | 3 | 19 | 22 | +13 | 14:04 | 74 | 4.1% | 1 | 10.5 | −7.5 | 53.0% | |
| 77 | 5 | 15 | 20 | +20 | 21:40 | 90 | 5.6% | 1 | 4.8 | +0.2 | 52.5% | |
| 57 | 12 | 7 | 19 | −4 | 10:45 | 90 | 13.3% | 1 | 8.8 | +3.2 | 52.0% | |
| 66 | 3 | 12 | 15 | −5 | 10:06 | 53 | 5.7% | 0 | 5.6 | −2.6 | 50.4% | |
| 70 | 3 | 10 | 13 | −3 | 14:50 | 94 | 3.2% | 1 | 4.7 | −1.7 | 51.5% | |
| 46 | 7 | 5 | 12 | −11 | 10:37 | 54 | 13.0% | 1 | 4.6 | +2.4 | 48.2% | |
| 64 | 2 | 9 | 11 | −1 | 14:46 | 56 | 3.6% | 0 | 1.4 | +0.6 | 50.1% | |
| 20 | 3 | 6 | 9 | +12 | 21:01 | 28 | 10.7% | 0 | 1.6 | +1.4 | 58.2% | |
| 27 | 0 | 3 | 3 | −6 | 8:30 | 22 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 53.7% | |
| 9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | −4 | 7:51 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 0.4 | +1.6 | 31.9% | |
| 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | −1 | 13:39 | 11 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.1 | −1.1 | 61.8% | |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 14:17 | 10 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.3 | −0.3 | 50.9% | |
| 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 14:00 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.8 | −0.8 | 64.2% | |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −2 | 8:11 | 10 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.9 | −0.9 | 50.0% | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 14:58 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 61.4% | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 8:37 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 23.2% | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 6:59 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.2 | −0.2 | 45.0% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 37 | 35 | 24 | 6 | 3 | .903 | 2.64 | 1 | +2.9 | .757 | |
| 31 | 27 | 11 | 13 | 4 | .876 | 3.50 | 1 | −19.2 | .760 | |
| 11 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | .921 | 2.13 | 1 | +5.6 | .800 | |
| 10 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 2 | .868 | 3.75 | 0 | −9.9 | .696 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
1st pair
93rd percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.
- 1st pair
- 2nd pair
- 3rd pair
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
2nd pair- Goals /600.2564th pct
- Assists /601.2184th pct
- ixG /600.2572nd pct
- Shots /604.0950th pct
Play-driving
1st pair- xGF% (5v5)53.1%78th pct
- CF% (5v5)52.6%78th pct
- Relative xGF%+0.557th pct
- xGA /60 (lower is better)2.2688th pct
Usage
1st pair- TOI per game26:1499th pct
- PP time share60.0%91st pct
- PK time share44.8%71st pct
- Quality of competition25.3%97th pct
Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.