Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 10, 2010·Prudential Center, Newark

Buffalo Sabres 5, New Jersey Devils 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 67% of the time.

NJD winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF08317110072542
NJD1931307031432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:12NJDJason ArnottAssists: Patrik Elias, Mattias Tedenby · Backhand, 0.33 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:22BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Tim Connolly, Jordan Leopold · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:35BUFDerek RoyAssists: Thomas Vanek, Tyler Myers · Slap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:58NJDDavid ClarksonAssists: Alexander Vasyunov, Andy Greene · Deflected, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:01NJDJason ArnottPPAssists: Andy Greene, Patrik Elias · Slap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:50BUFTyler MyersAssists: Rob Niedermayer, Andrej Sekera · Snap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P2 18:01NJDJamie LangenbrunnerAssists: Henrik Tallinder, Travis Zajac · Deflected, 0.18 xG3–4
  8. P3 8:54BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Tyler Myers, Derek Roy · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Jason Pominville stopped
  2. 2. NJD Jason Arnott stopped
  3. 3. BUF Thomas Vanek scored
  4. 4. NJD Patrik Elias stopped
  5. 5. BUF Tyler Ennis stopped
  6. 6. NJD Jamie Langenbrunner scored
  7. 7. BUF Derek Roy scored
  8. 8. NJD Ilya Kovalchuk stopped
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 12:37NJDDainius Zubrus: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 11:44BUFTyler Ennis: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 18:40NJDJason Arnott: Interference2 min
  4. P3 13:00BUFRob Niedermayer: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NJD
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackNJD attack →
  1. P1 20:00Arnott won the faceoff against Hecht
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFNJD
42Shots on goal32
3.0Expected goals2.1
59Shot attempts45
22Faceoffs won38
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
9Hits21
6Blocked shots11
7Giveaways16
8Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – Vanek – Ennis13:12

    xG 0.82–0.46 (64%)attempts 14–11goals 2–0

  2. Niedermayer – Grier – McCormick11:25

    xG 0.07–0.11 (41%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Hecht – Connolly – Pominville10:21

    xG 0.60–0.75 (44%)attempts 14–7goals 1–3

  4. Gaustad – Ellis – Kaleta12:26

    xG 0.16–0.37 (31%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Montador18:27

    xG 1.05–0.80 (57%)attempts 19–10goals 1–2

  2. Sekera – Myers15:15

    xG 0.41–0.20 (67%)attempts 16–11goals 2–0

  3. Morrisonn – Butler15:39

    xG 0.01–0.84 (1%)attempts 2–16goals 0–1

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestArnott – Elias – Tedenby11:48

    xG 0.61–0.17 (78%)attempts 12–6goals 1–1

  2. Zubrus – Clarkson – Vasyunov12:16

    xG 0.48–0.30 (61%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  3. Mair – Pelley – Gionta7:10

    xG 0.07–0.18 (27%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

  4. Langenbrunner – Kovalchuk – Zajac11:54

    xG 0.46–0.89 (34%)attempts 9–16goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGreene – Taormina7:00

    xG 0.29–0.04 (88%)attempts 11–2goals 0–1

  2. White – Tallinder12:59

    xG 0.78–0.72 (52%)attempts 10–11goals 2–2

  3. Tallinder – Magnan2:26

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NJD 2.1 xGBUF 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NJDBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #48 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.67 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50NJD 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 67% of the time.

NJD winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (NJD − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).