Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 24, 2010·St. Pete Times Forum, Tampa

New York Rangers 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 89% of the time.

TBL winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NYR0502313320
TBL21131409534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:06TBLRyan MalonePPAssists: Steven Stamkos, Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.28 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:37TBLRyan MalonePPAssists: Steven Stamkos, Teddy Purcell · Wrist, 0.33 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:53TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Steve Downie, Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:05TBLBrett ClarkPPGWGAssists: Steve Downie, Teddy Purcell · Slap, 0.15 xG0–4
  5. P2 16:56TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Mattias Ritola, Sean Bergenheim · Snap, 0.02 xG0–5
  6. P3 3:58NYRSteve EmingerAssists: Derek Stepan · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–5
  7. P3 12:51NYRBrian BoyleSHAssists: Marc Staal, Brandon Prust · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–5
  8. P3 18:56NYRDerek StepanPPAssists: Marian Gaborik, Michael Del Zotto · Slap, 0.14 xG3–5
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 6:05NYRRyan Callahan: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:47NYRDerek Boogaard: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:52NYRBrandon Dubinsky: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 8:34TBLRyan Malone: Interference2 min
  5. P2 8:34NYRHenrik Lundqvist: Diving2 min
  6. P2 10:08NYRMarc Staal: Roughing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 13:31TBLBlair Jones: Holding2 min
  8. P3 5:13TBLAdam Hall: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 11:26TBLMattias Ohlund: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 11:26NYRSean Avery: Instigator2 min
  11. P3 11:26NYRSean Avery: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 11:26NYRSean Avery: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 14:59NYRBrandon Prust: Elbowing2 min
  14. P3 17:57TBLDominic Moore: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  15. P3 18:26TBLMattias Ohlund: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  16. P3 0:00NYRBrandon Dubinsky: Slashing2 min
  17. P3 0:00TBLVictor Hedman: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← NYR attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Moore won the faceoff against Boyle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRTBL
20Shots on goal34
1.3Expected goals4.0
45Shot attempts54
22Faceoffs won34
4Power plays6
31Penalty minutes17
22Hits10
11Blocked shots18
10Giveaways11
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestDubinsky – Callahan – Anisimov3:54

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Frolov – Callahan – Stepan2:09

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Fedotenko – Boyle – Prust9:18

    xG 0.19–0.24 (44%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Avery – Boogaard – Christensen4:16

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Eminger – Del Zotto11:20

    xG 0.24–0.26 (48%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

  2. Sauer – Gilroy12:12

    xG 0.17–0.33 (34%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Girardi14:05

    xG 0.16–0.54 (22%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestHall – Bergenheim – Thompson5:40

    xG 0.37–0.02 (96%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Ritola – Jones – Tyrell3:21

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Downie – Stamkos8:35

    xG 0.19–0.17 (53%)attempts 2–8goals 1–1

  4. Malone – Moore – Purcell7:03

    xG 0.09–0.16 (36%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKubina – Jones13:57

    xG 0.38–0.08 (83%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Clark – Hedman9:41

    xG 0.37–0.12 (76%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  3. Lundin – Hedman2:20

    xG 0.15–0.08 (64%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 4.0 xGNYR 1.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLNYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #206 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.53 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 89% of the time.

TBL winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).