Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 22, 2010·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit

Vancouver Canucks 4, Detroit Red Wings 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 51% of the time.

DET winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
VAN0173131801439
DET11411121911545

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:12DETDaniel ClearyAssists: Todd Bertuzzi, Brian Rafalski · Snap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:11VANHenrik SedinPPAssists: Ryan Kesler, Daniel Sedin · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:29DETValtteri FilppulaAssists: Daniel Cleary, Jonathan Ericsson · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:21VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Ryan Kesler, Christian Ehrhoff · Wrist, 0.36 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:39VANMikael SamuelssonAssists: Henrik Sedin · Snap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:54DETHenrik ZetterbergAssists: Niklas Kronwall, Ruslan Salei · Backhand, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:10VANJeff TambelliniAssists: Ryan Kesler · Snap, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:06DETNicklas LidstromPPAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Brian Rafalski · Snap, 0.23 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:59DETHenrik ZetterbergGWGAssists: Brian Rafalski, Darren Helm · Snap, 0.03 xG4–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P2 0:56DETBrian Rafalski: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 1:35VANKevin Bieksa: Interference2 min
  3. P2 2:56DETTomas Holmstrom: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 6:57VANMikael Samuelsson: Interference2 min
  5. P2 10:33DETValtteri Filppula: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  6. P3 5:30VANAlexander Edler: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 15:09VANAlexandre Burrows: Cross checking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zetterberg won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANDET
39Shots on goal45
3.3Expected goals3.2
53Shot attempts63
38Faceoffs won33
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
29Hits33
9Blocked shots6
10Giveaways11
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows12:04

    xG 0.69–0.29 (70%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Kesler – Tambellini – Hansen12:05

    xG 0.55–0.65 (46%)attempts 12–14goals 1–1

  3. Malhotra – Samuelsson – Torres10:38

    xG 0.27–0.51 (34%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

  4. Bolduc – Glass – Volpatti6:10

    xG 0.09–0.62 (12%)attempts 2–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Bieksa18:54

    xG 0.85–0.80 (52%)attempts 14–18goals 0–0

  2. Ballard – Rome11:09

    xG 0.59–0.59 (50%)attempts 13–10goals 1–1

  3. Ehrhoff – Edler16:54

    xG 0.68–0.77 (47%)attempts 17–19goals 1–1

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestEaves – Miller – Helm5:56

    xG 0.61–0.25 (71%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Holmstrom – Filppula – Franzen3:38

    xG 0.44–0.09 (83%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Holmstrom – Datsyuk – Franzen4:50

    xG 0.26–0.16 (62%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Hudler – Abdelkader4:58

    xG 0.21–0.14 (60%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRafalski – Ericsson13:19

    xG 1.08–0.38 (74%)attempts 20–12goals 2–1

  2. Salei – Kronwall15:07

    xG 0.82–0.84 (50%)attempts 17–15goals 1–0

  3. Lidstrom – Stuart14:09

    xG 0.35–0.45 (44%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 3.2 xGVAN 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #25 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.99 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 51% of the time.

DET winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).