Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 31, 2010·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Ottawa Senators 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 61% of the time.

CBJ winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
OTT01011221402338
CBJ17290413423

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:45CBJR.J. UmbergerAssists: Fedor Tyutin, Jakub Voracek · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P2 12:13CBJSamuel PahlssonAssists: Chris Clark · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P2 15:27CBJRick NashAssists: Kristian Huselius, Antoine Vermette · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P2 18:57OTTMike FisherUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 1:18OTTNick FolignoAssists: Jesse Winchester, Chris Neil · Snap, 0.19 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:49OTTDaniel AlfredssonAssists: Milan Michalek, Alex Kovalev · Wrist, 0.41 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:06CBJJakub VoracekGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:56OTTAlex Kovalev: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 4:10CBJChris Clark: Interference2 min
  3. P1 5:26OTTErik Karlsson: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 13:48CBJMarc Methot: Cross checking2 min
  5. P1 16:36OTTDaniel Alfredsson: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 3:30CBJDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 3:30OTTBrian Lee: Interference2 min
  8. P2 3:30OTTBrian Lee: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 3:30CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 5:03CBJChris Clark: High sticking2 min
  11. P2 8:48OTTMatt Carkner: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← OTT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kelly won the faceoff against Brassard
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTCBJ
38Shots on goal23
3.6Expected goals2.9
55Shot attempts57
25Faceoffs won28
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes13
27Hits28
16Blocked shots10
3Giveaways4
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestAlfredsson – Fisher – Regin6:19

    xG 0.47–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–1goals 1–0

  2. O'Brien – Smith – Winchester3:56

    xG 0.43–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Neil – Foligno – Winchester5:14

    xG 0.23–0.07 (78%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  4. Neil – Kelly – Michalek6:51

    xG 0.27–0.22 (56%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGonchar – Lee9:27

    xG 0.55–0.10 (84%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  2. Phillips – Karlsson12:54

    xG 0.77–0.66 (54%)attempts 12–16goals 1–2

  3. Gonchar – Campoli3:18

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestHuselius – Vermette – Nash10:43

    xG 0.61–0.49 (56%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

  2. MacKenzie – Boll – Dorsett6:23

    xG 0.15–0.04 (78%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Moreau – Clark – Pahlsson10:20

    xG 0.21–0.35 (38%)attempts 8–6goals 1–1

  4. Umberger – Brassard – Voracek8:57

    xG 0.19–0.70 (22%)attempts 6–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Stralman11:59

    xG 0.44–0.36 (55%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  2. Tyutin – Hejda2:29

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Methot – Stralman2:34

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.9 xGOTT 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #78 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.04 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +46 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 61% of the time.

CBJ winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).