Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 5, 2011·United Center, Chicago

Dallas Stars 4, Chicago Blackhawks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 51% of the time.

CHI winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL2110526422
CHI012215010237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:40DALBrenden MorrowPPAssists: Loui Eriksson, Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.48 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:28DALMike RibeiroPPAssists: Brad Richards, Brenden Morrow · Tip-in, 0.25 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:35CHIFernando PisaniAssists: Bryan Bickell, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:43CHITomas KopeckyAssists: Patrick Kane, Jassen Cullimore · Backhand, 0.19 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:46DALMike RibeiroPPGWGAssists: Brad Richards, Trevor Daley · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:59DALSteve OttENAssists: Loui Eriksson · Wrist, 0.55 xG4–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 2:00CHITomas Kopecky: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:34CHIBrian Campbell: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:25DALJames Neal: Interference2 min
  4. P2 12:53DALNicklas Grossmann: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  5. P2 19:33DALBrandon Segal: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P3 4:34DALStephane Robidas: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 9:11CHIPatrick Sharp: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 17:55DALJamie Benn: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← DAL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Richards won the faceoff against Bolland
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALCHI
22Shots on goal37
2.4Expected goals2.4
36Shot attempts71
28Faceoffs won29
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
26Hits39
20Blocked shots9
5Giveaways12
13Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestOtt – Burish – Wandell7:16

    xG 0.16–0.05 (78%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  2. Barch – Sutherby – Segal2:56

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Richards – Eriksson – Neal12:01

    xG 0.19–0.39 (32%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  4. Morrow – Ribeiro – Benn10:50

    xG 0.09–0.66 (12%)attempts 7–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestRobidas – Grossmann17:00

    xG 0.57–0.46 (55%)attempts 10–22goals 0–0

  2. Skrastins – Niskanen8:01

    xG 0.11–0.26 (31%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  3. Woywitka – Daley16:39

    xG 0.20–0.46 (30%)attempts 10–16goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Sharp – Toews8:31

    xG 0.22–0.01 (94%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  2. Kopecky – Brouwer – Kane5:02

    xG 0.32–0.14 (70%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  3. Pisani – Bolland – Kane5:37

    xG 0.18–0.08 (68%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Bolland – Bickell – Stalberg2:07

    xG 0.09–0.03 (76%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook19:01

    xG 0.37–0.13 (75%)attempts 21–6goals 0–0

  2. Campbell – Hjalmarsson14:32

    xG 0.75–0.56 (57%)attempts 18–13goals 2–0

  3. Campbell – Keith3:38

    xG 0.16–0.07 (68%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.4 xGDAL 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #393 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.54 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 51% of the time.

CHI winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).