Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 19, 2011·St. Pete Times Forum, Tampa

Florida Panthers 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
FLA0611018021326
TBL11201318030236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:45TBLMarc-Andre BergeronAssists: Randy Jones, Martin St. Louis · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:24FLADavid BoothPPAssists: Dennis Wideman, Stephen Weiss · Tip-in, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P3 0:14TBLSean BergenheimAssists: Dominic Moore, Adam Hall · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P3 17:00FLAMike SantorelliPPAssists: Cory Stillman, Bryan McCabe · Backhand, 0.39 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. FLA Mike Santorelli scored
  2. 2. TBL Adam Hall stopped
  3. 3. FLA David Booth stopped
  4. 4. TBL Dominic Moore stopped
  5. 5. FLA Cory Stillman stopped
  6. 6. TBL Steve Downie stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 7:56FLAMike Weaver: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 10:33FLACory Stillman: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 15:55FLAKeaton Ellerby: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 18:38TBLDominic Moore: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:09TBLMattias Ohlund: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 1:17FLAMarty Reasoner: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 12:28FLADavid Booth: Interference2 min
  8. P3 15:26TBLNate Thompson: Boarding2 min · PPG
  9. OT 2:20FLARadek Dvorak: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Moore won the faceoff against Weiss
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLATBL
26Shots on goal36
2.4Expected goals2.7
54Shot attempts69
20Faceoffs won27
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
28Hits24
12Blocked shots16
6Giveaways12
12Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestStillman – Dvorak – Reasoner10:51

    xG 0.57–0.41 (58%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  2. Higgins – Olesz – Santorelli7:59

    xG 0.26–0.21 (55%)attempts 10–10goals 0–1

  3. Hordichuk – Bernier – Timmins4:15

    xG 0.09–0.15 (36%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Weiss – Booth – Skille11:10

    xG 0.30–0.43 (41%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Ellerby2:33

    xG 0.18–0.09 (66%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Wideman – Ellerby3:59

    xG 0.05–0.03 (62%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  3. McCabe – Wideman7:37

    xG 0.32–0.35 (48%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestLecavalier – Gagne – Thompson5:38

    xG 0.23–0.08 (74%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Hall – Moore – Bergenheim10:17

    xG 0.51–0.38 (57%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  3. St. Louis – Downie – Stamkos11:11

    xG 0.37–0.24 (60%)attempts 17–9goals 1–0

  4. Lecavalier – Gagne – Purcell3:40

    xG 0.03–0.40 (7%)attempts 1–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBergeron – Hedman2:26

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Kubina – Jones10:05

    xG 0.47–0.33 (59%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

  3. Ohlund – Brewer12:40

    xG 0.40–0.31 (56%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.7 xGFLA 2.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #350 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).