Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 12, 2011·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise

Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Florida Panthers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
TBL0811021901338
FLA05182915427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:33FLADavid BoothAssists: Mike Weaver, Keaton Ellerby · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P2 14:10TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Martin St. Louis, Simon Gagne · Slap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P3 2:22FLARyan CarterAssists: Dmitry Kulikov, Mike Santorelli · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P3 5:18FLANiclas BergforsAssists: Jason Garrison, Stephen Weiss · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P3 12:35TBLVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Martin St. Louis, Simon Gagne · Tip-in, 0.26 xG2–3
  6. P3 17:55TBLSimon GagnePPAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Steven Stamkos · Wrap-around, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:44FLAJason GarrisonGWGAssists: Mike Santorelli, Marty Reasoner · Backhand, 0.08 xG3–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 9:38TBLNate Thompson: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 14:50TBLVictor Hedman: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 16:08FLAMarty Reasoner: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 19:50FLAMichal Repik: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 12:02FLADavid Booth: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 13:29FLAJason Garrison: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 14:34TBLDana Tyrell: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P2 18:04TBLBrett Clark: Interference2 min
  9. P3 9:27FLAJason Garrison: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  10. P3 12:27FLABill Thomas: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P3 17:36FLANiclas Bergfors: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
47% to win53% to win
← TBL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lecavalier won the faceoff against Weiss
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLFLA
38Shots on goal27
3.0Expected goals1.8
70Shot attempts40
36Faceoffs won27
8Power plays4
8Penalty minutes16
25Hits22
8Blocked shots13
4Giveaways8
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestGagne – Thompson – Purcell4:57

    xG 0.22–0.01 (96%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Moore – Bergenheim – Ritola6:17

    xG 0.10–0.10 (50%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  3. St. Louis – Lecavalier – Stamkos7:13

    xG 0.30–0.34 (48%)attempts 11–8goals 0–2

  4. Lecavalier – Hall – Thompson2:25

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Bergeron – Hedman9:49

    xG 0.45–0.41 (52%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

  2. Brewer – Hedman3:32

    xG 0.09–0.07 (57%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Ohlund – Clark9:11

    xG 0.12–0.15 (44%)attempts 6–7goals 0–2

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestReasoner – Booth – Repik12:34

    xG 0.50–0.21 (70%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Samsonov – Weiss – Bergfors11:06

    xG 0.50–0.22 (70%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  3. Bernier – Santorelli – Carter2:07

    xG 0.08–0.06 (56%)attempts 2–4goals 1–0

  4. Hordichuk – Thomas – Carter4:07

    xG 0.02–0.23 (9%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllerby – Kulikov12:06

    xG 0.60–0.35 (63%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  2. Weaver – Garrison14:18

    xG 0.40–0.34 (55%)attempts 11–13goals 1–0

  3. Callahan – Wilson7:39

    xG 0.21–0.16 (57%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 1.8 xGTBL 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLATBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #66 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.45 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).