Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 22, 2011·Scotiabank Place, Ottawa

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Ottawa Senators 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 78% of the time.

OTT winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ181716321
OTT1616215427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:47OTTFilip KubaPPAssists: Jason Spezza, Sergei Gonchar · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:56CBJAaron JohnsonAssists: Derick Brassard, Vinny Prospal · Backhand, 0.29 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:16CBJKris RussellAssists: Ryan Johansen, Antoine Vermette · Snap, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:30OTTZack SmithAssists: Erik Condra, Chris Neil · Snap, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:20CBJRick NashPPAssists: Fedor Tyutin, Vinny Prospal · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:24OTTJason SpezzaAssists: Milan Michalek, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.48 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:55OTTMilan MichalekPPGWGAssists: Sergei Gonchar, Jason Spezza · Tip-in, 0.22 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 5:23CBJDavid Savard: Delaying game2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:54OTTMika Zibanejad: Boarding2 min
  3. P2 17:39OTTZack Smith: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 8:19OTTColin Greening: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 17:29OTTDavid Rundblad: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 18:36CBJKris Russell: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 19:01OTTChris Neil: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
45% to win55% to win
← CBJ attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKenzie won the faceoff against Zibanejad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJOTT
21Shots on goal27
1.5Expected goals3.0
39Shot attempts48
23Faceoffs won21
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes18
31Hits26
12Blocked shots11
10Giveaways7
14Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMacKenzie – Giroux – Bass6:52

    xG 0.12–0.06 (66%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  2. Vermette – Umberger – Johansen15:01

    xG 0.54–0.54 (50%)attempts 14–11goals 1–0

  3. Pahlsson – Dorsett – Mayorov10:31

    xG 0.08–0.28 (21%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. Prospal – Nash – Brassard11:08

    xG 0.50–0.76 (40%)attempts 11–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Russell20:12

    xG 0.72–0.53 (57%)attempts 13–15goals 2–0

  2. Moore – Savard8:46

    xG 0.10–0.08 (56%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Tyutin – Clitsome19:25

    xG 0.47–1.02 (32%)attempts 18–17goals 0–1

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestNeil – Condra – Smith7:04

    xG 0.35–0.01 (96%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Neil – Condra – Zibanejad3:34

    xG 0.31–0.02 (95%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  3. Alfredsson – Foligno – Smith4:02

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  4. Konopka – Winchester – Da Costa4:55

    xG 0.08–0.07 (54%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGonchar – Phillips2:34

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Gonchar – Cowen12:38

    xG 0.24–0.05 (82%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Phillips – Rundblad10:32

    xG 0.16–0.30 (35%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 3.0 xGCBJ 1.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #91 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.48 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 78% of the time.

OTT winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).