Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 25, 2011·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Tampa Bay Lightning 4, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 74% of the time.

BUF winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL2101617423
BUF21507117339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:56BUFThomas VanekAssists: Jason Pominville, Luke Adam · Backhand, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 2:31BUFBrad BoyesAssists: Cody McCormick, Matt Ellis · Backhand, 0.08 xG0–2
  3. P1 13:03TBLVincent LecavalierAssists: Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:00TBLNate ThompsonAssists: Tom Pyatt, Dominic Moore · Backhand, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 4:42TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Matt Gilroy, Marc-Andre Bergeron · Tip-in, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:37TBLRyan MaloneGWGAssists: Brett Clark · Wrist, 0.17 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:10BUFNathan GerbeAssists: Brad Boyes, Paul Gaustad · Slap, 0.09 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 9:12BUFThomas Vanek: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 13:20BUFPatrick Kaleta: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:20TBLSteve Downie: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 4:37BUFRobyn Regehr: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 4:37TBLRyan Malone: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 5:12TBLNate Thompson: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 9:39TBLVictor Hedman: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 11:15BUFDrew Stafford: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 6:27BUFCody McCormick: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  10. P3 14:07TBLVincent Lecavalier: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← TBL attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Roy won the faceoff against Hall
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLBUF
23Shots on goal39
1.8Expected goals3.2
35Shot attempts61
26Faceoffs won36
3Power plays3
13Penalty minutes13
16Hits18
14Blocked shots7
7Giveaways4
5Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestHall – Jones – Pyatt2:18

    xG 0.18–0.03 (86%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Moore – Thompson – Downie6:42

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Lecavalier – Connolly11:22

    xG 0.67–1.05 (39%)attempts 7–17goals 1–0

  4. Malone – Purcell – Stamkos6:16

    xG 0.16–1.15 (12%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Hedman15:37

    xG 0.89–0.30 (75%)attempts 17–13goals 2–1

  2. Clark – Kubina14:10

    xG 0.56–1.03 (35%)attempts 8–15goals 1–1

  3. Bergeron – Gilroy12:14

    xG 0.05–1.40 (4%)attempts 2–18goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Vanek – Adam11:35

    xG 1.31–0.71 (65%)attempts 13–8goals 1–1

  2. Gaustad – Kaleta – Gerbe7:33

    xG 0.73–0.25 (75%)attempts 14–2goals 0–0

  3. Boyes – McCormick – Ellis5:05

    xG 0.25–0.02 (93%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  4. Roy – Stafford – Leino10:17

    xG 0.17–0.25 (41%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Sekera13:58

    xG 1.40–0.23 (86%)attempts 17–11goals 1–1

  2. Leopold – Gragnani11:36

    xG 0.37–0.05 (88%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  3. Regehr – Myers14:18

    xG 0.85–0.78 (52%)attempts 16–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.2 xGTBL 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #325 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.48 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 74% of the time.

BUF winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).