Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 27, 2011·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Nashville Predators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 75% of the time.

NSH winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL21401216332
NSH293909527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:25NSHSergei KostitsynAssists: Craig Smith, Mike Fisher · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:05NSHMike FisherAssists: Sergei Kostitsyn, Craig Smith · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:36TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Teddy Purcell, Ryan Malone · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:33TBLTeddy PurcellPPAssists: Brett Connolly, Marc-Andre Bergeron · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:43NSHPatric HornqvistAssists: Matt Halischuk, Blake Geoffrion · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 11:20NSHNick SpalingGWGAssists: Jack Hillen, Jonathon Blum · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–4
  7. P2 12:10NSHMike FisherAssists: Nick Spaling · Slap, 0.15 xG2–5
  8. P3 17:03TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Marc-Andre Bergeron, Martin St. Louis · Tip-in, 0.07 xG3–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 17:53NSHJordin Tootoo: Charging2 min · PPG
  2. P2 0:47TBLPavel Kubina: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 12:47NSHJack Hillen: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 12:47TBLBlair Jones: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 6:22TBLBrett Clark: Interference2 min
  6. P3 10:04TBLSteve Downie: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 18:34NSHPatric Hornqvist: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
45% to win55% to win
← TBL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Spaling won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLNSH
32Shots on goal27
1.7Expected goals3.1
62Shot attempts46
26Faceoffs won36
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
18Hits24
10Blocked shots18
7Giveaways11
11Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Lecavalier – Stamkos2:57

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  2. Hall – Jones – Pyatt4:03

    xG 0.15–0.16 (48%)attempts 6–1goals 0–1

  3. Malone – Purcell – Stamkos10:18

    xG 0.39–0.41 (49%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  4. Moore – Thompson – Downie7:17

    xG 0.33–0.59 (35%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Hedman12:25

    xG 0.48–0.25 (65%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

  2. Bergeron – Gilroy9:30

    xG 0.42–0.26 (62%)attempts 14–3goals 1–1

  3. Kubina – Bergeron2:47

    xG 0.07–0.24 (21%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Hornqvist – Wilson8:00

    xG 0.62–0.06 (91%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Fisher – Kostitsyn – Smith7:33

    xG 0.36–0.05 (88%)attempts 6–7goals 2–0

  3. Smithson – Tootoo – Spaling8:10

    xG 0.36–0.06 (86%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  4. Fisher – Spaling – Smith4:05

    xG 0.27–0.09 (76%)attempts 3–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Weber17:04

    xG 0.92–0.25 (79%)attempts 15–20goals 4–1

  2. Klein – Blum2:54

    xG 0.40–0.01 (98%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Bouillon – Klein14:28

    xG 0.56–0.40 (58%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.1 xGTBL 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #258 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.20 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 75% of the time.

NSH winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).