Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 15, 2011·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Colorado Avalanche 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 58% of the time.

PIT winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL31201203327
PIT110111412633

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:51COLJay McClementAssists: Milan Hejduk, Erik Johnson · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:24COLMatt DucheneAssists: Paul Stastny, Kyle Quincey · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P1 18:33PITJordan StaalAssists: Tyler Kennedy, Deryk Engelland · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P1 19:44COLDavid JonesAssists: Jay McClement, TJ Galiardi · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 11:01PITPascal DupuisAssists: Craig Adams, Arron Asham · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:12PITBrooks OrpikAssists: Evgeni Malkin, James Neal · Slap, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P3 4:45PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: James Neal · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–4
  8. P3 7:17PITJames NealPPAssists: Steve Sullivan, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.26 xG3–5
  9. P3 10:30PITKris LetangAssists: Jordan Staal, Joe Vitale · Backhand, 0.06 xG3–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:41COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:41PITArron Asham: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 7:45COLTJ Galiardi: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 8:58COLRyan O'Byrne: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 2:37COLRyan O'Byrne: Interference2 min
  6. P2 12:01PITJames Neal: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 6:41COLTJ Galiardi: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 7:26COLRyan O'Byrne: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 11:57COLChuck Kobasew: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 17:33COLCody McLeod: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P3 19:50PITMatt Niskanen: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← COL attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLPIT
27Shots on goal33
1.5Expected goals1.8
43Shot attempts61
28Faceoffs won33
2Power plays7
19Penalty minutes9
14Hits18
18Blocked shots13
0Giveaways6
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestHejduk – Stastny – Duchene11:59

    xG 0.78–0.30 (72%)attempts 17–11goals 1–1

  2. Kobasew – McClement – McLeod2:27

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Lindstrom – Jones – Galiardi4:27

    xG 0.01–0.10 (9%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

  4. Winnik – O'Reilly – Landeskog9:24

    xG 0.07–0.17 (30%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHejda – Johnson15:12

    xG 0.86–0.34 (72%)attempts 20–12goals 1–1

  2. O'Byrne – Wilson12:58

    xG 0.36–0.28 (56%)attempts 7–12goals 0–2

  3. Quincey – O'Brien13:39

    xG 0.18–0.54 (25%)attempts 10–14goals 2–2

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCooke – Kennedy – Staal2:26

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

  2. Park – Cooke – Kennedy2:07

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Sullivan – Malkin – Neal8:02

    xG 0.39–0.44 (47%)attempts 10–12goals 2–0

  4. Dupuis – Kunitz – Staal5:50

    xG 0.08–0.23 (26%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPicard – Niskanen14:47

    xG 0.43–0.22 (66%)attempts 11–6goals 2–0

  2. Martin – Engelland11:58

    xG 0.33–0.21 (62%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

  3. Orpik – Engelland2:32

    xG 0.05–0.30 (13%)attempts 2–5goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 1.8 xGCOL 1.5 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #131 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.88 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 58% of the time.

PIT winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).