Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 25, 2011·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Buffalo Sabres 1, Columbus Blue Jackets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 70% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF06113010129
CBJ21531009534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:50CBJMark LetestuAssists: Ryan Johansen, Fedor Tyutin · Wrist, 0.33 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:19CBJRick NashPPGWGAssists: James Wisniewski, Jeff Carter · Deflected, 0.22 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:17CBJMarc MethotAssists: James Wisniewski, Derek Dorsett · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:29CBJR.J. UmbergerAssists: Ryan Johansen · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–4
  5. P2 8:01BUFJordan LeopoldAssists: Zack Kassian, Robyn Regehr · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–4
  6. P2 14:07CBJRick NashAssists: Jeff Carter, Nikita Nikitin · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:43BUFLuke Adam: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 3:17CBJGrant Clitsome: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 15:50BUFMarc-Andre Gragnani: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P1 18:56BUFThomas Vanek: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 5:32BUFMatt Ellis: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 11:11CBJDerek MacKenzie: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 1:46BUFTJ Brennan: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 14:46CBJDerek Dorsett: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 0:00CBJJeff Carter: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hecht won the faceoff against Pahlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCBJ
29Shots on goal34
1.9Expected goals3.0
49Shot attempts50
30Faceoffs won26
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
15Hits18
8Blocked shots8
4Giveaways3
5Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – Stafford – Leino9:29

    xG 0.59–0.14 (81%)attempts 16–3goals 0–0

  2. Vanek – Adam – Kassian2:25

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Gaustad – Ellis – Tropp2:39

    xG 0.07–0.01 (84%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Ellis – Adam – Kassian5:13

    xG 0.01–0.03 (34%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Ehrhoff3:52

    xG 0.24–0.02 (92%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Sekera – Brennan2:47

    xG 0.18–0.09 (66%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

  3. Ehrhoff – Brennan3:13

    xG 0.12–0.12 (49%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMacKenzie – Boll – Brassard9:36

    xG 0.31–0.08 (80%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Umberger – Letestu – Johansen8:23

    xG 0.34–0.15 (70%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  3. Pahlsson – Vermette – Dorsett9:56

    xG 0.25–0.22 (54%)attempts 8–5goals 1–1

  4. Prospal – Nash – Carter12:55

    xG 0.34–0.88 (28%)attempts 6–22goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Nikitin14:58

    xG 0.76–0.29 (72%)attempts 16–10goals 1–0

  2. Clitsome – Moore13:23

    xG 0.03–0.22 (11%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  3. Wisniewski – Methot13:33

    xG 0.50–0.81 (38%)attempts 6–18goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.0 xGBUF 1.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1033 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.59 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 70% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).