Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 21, 2011·HP Pavilion at San Jose, San Jose

Tampa Bay Lightning 2, San Jose Sharks 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 95% of the time.

SJS winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL1501514224
SJS513019211743

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:26SJSBenn FerrieroAssists: Joe Thornton, Dan Boyle · Slap, 0.54 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:51SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Brent Burns, Joe Thornton · Backhand, 0.32 xG0–2
  3. P1 6:21SJSAndrew DesjardinsGWGAssists: Andrew Murray · Wrap-around, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P1 13:13SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Patrick Marleau, Ryane Clowe · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–4
  5. P1 14:47SJSLogan CouturePPAssists: Michal Handzus, Ryane Clowe · Wrist, 0.44 xG0–5
  6. P1 15:38TBLDominic MooreAssists: Eric Brewer · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–5
  7. P3 1:15SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Michal Handzus · Slap, 0.01 xG1–6
  8. P3 7:45TBLMartin St. LouisAssists: Teddy Purcell · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–6
  9. P3 12:41SJSPatrick MarleauUnassisted · Backhand, 0.31 xG2–7
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:36SJSTorrey Mitchell: Holding2 min
  2. P1 4:26TBLMarc-Andre Bergeron: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:46TBLDominic Moore: Boarding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 10:35SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 15:05SJSRyane Clowe: Interference2 min
  6. P2 18:21TBLBlair Jones: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 2:21TBLSteve Downie: Elbowing2 min
  8. P3 2:24SJSMichal Handzus: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
45% to win55% to win
← TBL attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Handzus won the faceoff against Hall
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLSJS
24Shots on goal43
2.2Expected goals6.4
57Shot attempts72
29Faceoffs won39
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
26Hits14
15Blocked shots20
7Giveaways10
11Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. St. Louis – Malone – Purcell2:15

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  2. Lecavalier – Tyrell – Stamkos3:36

    xG 0.02–0.41 (6%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Bergeron – Gervais5:44

    xG 0.03–0.01 (71%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Kubina – Brewer2:10

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Clark – Hedman2:00

    xG 0.02–0.04 (38%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Pavelski – Ferriero6:31

    xG 1.41–0.07 (95%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Marleau – Clowe – Couture6:00

    xG 1.15–0.03 (98%)attempts 10–4goals 2–0

  3. Winchester – Murray – Desjardins5:44

    xG 0.14–0.11 (57%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  4. Handzus – Mitchell – McGinn6:37

    xG 0.08–0.24 (26%)attempts 3–6goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBoyle – Vlasic9:53

    xG 1.41–0.15 (90%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Burns – Demers8:45

    xG 1.26–0.34 (79%)attempts 10–12goals 3–1

  3. White – Braun7:52

    xG 0.28–0.02 (92%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 6.4 xGTBL 2.2 xG
0246P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #919 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.54 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 95% of the time.

SJS winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).