Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 4, 2012·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Florida Panthers 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 78% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA172706320
TBL1941718634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:37TBLNate ThompsonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:54FLATomas FleischmannAssists: Kris Versteeg, Mike Weaver · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:42TBLVincent LecavalierUnassisted · Snap, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:22TBLMartin St. LouisAssists: Ryan Shannon, Vincent Lecavalier · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:06FLAMikael SamuelssonAssists: Sean Bergenheim · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P2 12:36TBLSteven StamkosGWGAssists: Steve Downie, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–4
  7. P2 15:08TBLMartin St. LouisAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Ryan Shannon · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P2 19:14FLASean BergenheimAssists: Marcel Goc, Tyson Strachan · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:39TBLMartin St. LouisENAssists: Steven Stamkos, Vincent Lecavalier · Wrist, 0.68 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 16:40FLAStephen Weiss: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 18:24TBLSteve Downie: Hooking2 min
  3. P3 4:22TBLVictor Hedman: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 8:10FLASean Bergenheim: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 16:20TBLTom Pyatt: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 17:50FLAKris Versteeg: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
45% to win55% to win
← FLA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Moore won the faceoff against Weiss
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLATBL
20Shots on goal34
1.7Expected goals3.2
55Shot attempts54
23Faceoffs won27
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
19Hits26
12Blocked shots22
6Giveaways9
9Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestSamuelsson – Goc – Bergenheim12:21

    xG 0.63–0.46 (58%)attempts 14–11goals 2–2

  2. Kopecky – Santorelli – Matthias7:06

    xG 0.07–0.20 (25%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Bradley – Madden – Barch5:50

    xG 0.10–0.34 (23%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  4. Weiss – Fleischmann – Versteeg11:21

    xG 0.13–0.67 (16%)attempts 9–10goals 1–3

Defence pairs

  1. Strachan – Ellerby13:13

    xG 0.32–0.27 (54%)attempts 12–8goals 1–1

  2. Weaver – Garrison14:01

    xG 0.48–0.63 (43%)attempts 15–14goals 2–1

  3. Campbell – Gudbranson13:54

    xG 0.20–0.50 (29%)attempts 8–10goals 0–2

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestDownie – Purcell – Stamkos13:12

    xG 0.30–0.12 (71%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Moore – Thompson – Wyman4:02

    xG 0.24–0.15 (61%)attempts 2–6goals 1–1

  3. St. Louis – Lecavalier – Shannon5:40

    xG 0.29–0.38 (43%)attempts 4–7goals 3–1

  4. St. Louis – Lecavalier – Pyatt4:00

    xG 0.15–0.25 (38%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Hedman10:14

    xG 0.52–0.23 (69%)attempts 10–10goals 2–0

  2. Gervais – Mikkelson7:11

    xG 0.34–0.09 (79%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Gervais – Hedman2:36

    xG 0.09–0.03 (78%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.2 xGFLA 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #272 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 78% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).