Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 19, 2012·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Buffalo Sabres 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 51% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT0101719226
BUF2711037624

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:52BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Tyler Myers, Derek Roy · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:16BUFDerek RoyAssists: Jason Pominville, Christian Ehrhoff · Backhand, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:52BUFPaul GaustadGWGAssists: Nathan Gerbe, Jordan Leopold · Wrist, 0.28 xG0–3
  4. P2 3:39PITDeryk EngellandAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Slap, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 5:05PITJordan StaalPPAssists: James Neal, Steve Sullivan · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:10BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Christian Ehrhoff, Thomas Vanek · Wrap-around, 0.10 xG2–4
  7. P3 8:32BUFDerek RoySHAssists: Jason Pominville, Christian Ehrhoff · Tip-in, 0.19 xG2–5
  8. P3 16:43BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Zack Kassian, Ville Leino · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 6:09PITMatt Niskanen: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 12:52BUFVille Leino: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 17:39BUFDerek Roy: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 0:38PITPascal Dupuis: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 11:46PITMatt Cooke: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 17:36PITChris Kunitz: Broken stick2 min
  7. P3 3:33BUFRobyn Regehr: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 3:33PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 3:33BUFNathan Gerbe: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 6:39BUFJordan Leopold: Holding2 min
  11. P3 14:35PITJames Neal: Charging2 min
  12. P3 16:03PITMatt Cooke: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 16:03BUFDrew Stafford: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaustad won the faceoff against Kunitz
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBUF
26Shots on goal24
2.5Expected goals2.4
43Shot attempts57
25Faceoffs won29
4Power plays5
14Penalty minutes12
23Hits15
18Blocked shots5
6Giveaways11
3Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestPark – Adams – Vitale3:53

    xG 0.14–0.05 (72%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Kunitz – Malkin – Neal10:01

    xG 0.13–0.23 (37%)attempts 3–9goals 1–0

  3. Sullivan – Dupuis – Staal4:29

    xG 0.03–0.16 (16%)attempts 1–9goals 0–1

  4. Asham – Cooke – Jeffrey5:05

    xG 0.06–0.49 (11%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Michalek4:41

    xG 0.18–0.05 (77%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  2. Engelland – Niskanen2:44

    xG 0.16–0.06 (73%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  3. Martin – Engelland14:27

    xG 0.58–0.48 (54%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – Pominville – Vanek8:11

    xG 0.64–0.14 (82%)attempts 16–3goals 2–0

  2. Gaustad – Kaleta – Gerbe13:32

    xG 0.67–0.26 (72%)attempts 11–6goals 1–1

  3. Boyes – Ellis – Kassian7:39

    xG 0.16–0.29 (36%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  4. Stafford – Leino – Ennis8:17

    xG 0.08–0.41 (16%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Myers12:44

    xG 0.73–0.61 (55%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  2. Regehr – Sekera13:44

    xG 0.29–0.35 (45%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  3. Ehrhoff – Weber13:06

    xG 0.12–0.31 (29%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.4 xGPIT 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #356 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.95 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 51% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).