Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 2, 2012·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

New York Rangers 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 80% of the time.

TBL winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NYR13181701319
TBL0131112611431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:09NYRArtem AnisimovAssists: Ryan McDonagh · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:43NYRMarian GaborikPPAssists: Derek Stepan, Brad Richards · Slap, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:09TBLTom PyattAssists: Brett Connolly, Brian Lee · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:37TBLTeddy PurcellAssists: Martin St. Louis, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:17TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Brian Lee, Teddy Purcell · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:33NYRBrandon DubinskyAssists: Marian Gaborik, Anton Stralman · Snap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:58TBLRyan MaloneGWGAssists: Teddy Purcell, Eric Brewer · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 0:33NYRDan Girardi: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 11:48NYRBrian Boyle: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 11:48TBLBrett Connolly: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 19:42NYRRyan McDonagh: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 0:57TBLRyan Malone: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 1:00TBLKeith Aulie: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P3 10:33NYRCarl Hagelin: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
45% to win55% to win
← NYR attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stepan won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRTBL
19Shots on goal31
1.0Expected goals2.5
42Shot attempts63
29Faceoffs won23
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
28Hits26
13Blocked shots15
6Giveaways8
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. Rupp – Dubinsky – Scott6:50

    xG 0.11–0.07 (61%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  2. Richards – Mitchell – Hagelin10:12

    xG 0.20–0.19 (51%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Richards – Gaborik – Dubinsky2:01

    xG 0.03–0.08 (31%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  4. Gaborik – Anisimov – Stepan8:31

    xG 0.06–0.47 (11%)attempts 1–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Woywitka – Bickel7:26

    xG 0.16–0.21 (44%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Girardi6:37

    xG 0.10–0.16 (38%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Stralman – McDonagh6:38

    xG 0.00–0.23 (0%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Purcell – Stamkos15:58

    xG 0.97–0.30 (76%)attempts 25–10goals 2–1

  2. Hall – Malone – Thompson4:12

    xG 0.30–0.03 (90%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Malone – Pyatt – Connolly2:24

    xG 0.32–0.08 (80%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  4. Hall – Thompson – Wyman8:40

    xG 0.26–0.13 (67%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCommodore – Lee4:07

    xG 0.40–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 1–0

  2. Clark – Brewer5:48

    xG 0.23–0.03 (88%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Clark – Mikkelson2:07

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.5 xGNYR 1.0 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLNYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #82 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.35 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 80% of the time.

TBL winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).