Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 3, 2012·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Buffalo Sabres 5, Vancouver Canucks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 55% of the time.

VAN winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF3110628525
VAN012113210335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:55BUFVille LeinoAssists: Patrick Kaleta, Nathan Gerbe · Snap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:44BUFVille LeinoAssists: Patrick Kaleta, Tyler Myers · Wrist, 0.31 xG2–0
  3. P1 5:10BUFBrad BoyesAssists: Corey Tropp · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–0
  4. P2 15:37VANDavid BoothAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P3 2:36BUFChristian EhrhoffGWGAssists: Brad Boyes, Matt Ellis · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–1
  6. P3 3:43VANDavid BoothAssists: Zack Kassian · Backhand, 0.18 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:14VANZack KassianAssists: Ryan Kesler, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:57BUFTyler EnnisENAssists: Drew Stafford, Andrej Sekera · Wrist, 0.73 xG5–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 13:39VANAaron Rome: Illegal check to head2 min
  2. P2 7:34BUFPatrick Kaleta: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P2 8:51VANZack Kassian: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 9:30BUFTyler Ennis: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 13:37BUFAlexander Sulzer: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 18:00VANRyan Kesler: Holding2 min
  7. P2 19:11BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Hodgson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFVAN
25Shots on goal35
2.5Expected goals2.3
43Shot attempts62
22Faceoffs won27
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
12Hits29
15Blocked shots10
6Giveaways14
7Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestKaleta – Gerbe – Leino9:12

    xG 0.99–0.09 (91%)attempts 15–4goals 2–0

  2. Stafford – Hodgson – Ennis11:58

    xG 0.35–0.24 (60%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  3. Boyes – Ellis – Tropp10:07

    xG 0.13–0.23 (35%)attempts 6–14goals 2–0

  4. Roy – Pominville – Vanek8:33

    xG 0.13–0.58 (18%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Myers13:49

    xG 0.73–0.49 (60%)attempts 11–15goals 1–1

  2. Sekera – Weber14:57

    xG 0.56–0.34 (62%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

  3. Ehrhoff – Myers2:02

    xG 0.16–0.06 (74%)attempts 2–3goals 1–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestMalhotra – Lapierre – Raymond3:33

    xG 0.17–0.02 (92%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Pahlsson – Higgins – Hansen9:13

    xG 0.17–0.11 (61%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1

  3. Kesler – Booth – Kassian6:01

    xG 0.32–0.34 (49%)attempts 7–5goals 2–0

  4. Kesler – Booth – Raymond5:00

    xG 0.05–0.12 (31%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBieksa – Edler3:28

    xG 0.10–0.04 (68%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Salo – Edler6:48

    xG 0.10–0.07 (58%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Salo – Hamhuis4:26

    xG 0.10–0.13 (44%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.3 xGBUF 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #262 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 55% of the time.

VAN winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).