Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 4, 2012·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise

Ottawa Senators 2, Florida Panthers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 53% of the time.

FLA winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT2120805225
FLA0931415428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:23OTTJared CowenAssists: Kyle Turris · Snap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:32OTTChris NeilAssists: Jim O'Brien, Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–0
  3. P2 0:33FLAMarcel GocAssists: Mike Weaver, Tomas Kopecky · Tip-in, 0.24 xG2–1
  4. P2 2:54FLAKrys BarchAssists: Jack Skille, Mike Weaver · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:03FLAMikael SamuelssonPPGWGAssists: Stephen Weiss, Brian Campbell · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:34FLAJack SkilleAssists: Shawn Matthias · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 9:27FLASean Bergenheim: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 10:03OTTChris Neil: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  3. P2 19:43OTTJason Spezza: Interference2 min
  4. P3 11:00OTTErik Karlsson: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 14:06OTTErik Karlsson: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 14:43FLAJason Garrison: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
45% to win55% to win
← OTT attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Smithson won the faceoff against Spezza
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTFLA
25Shots on goal28
2.6Expected goals2.4
63Shot attempts46
23Faceoffs won27
2Power plays5
10Penalty minutes4
32Hits41
7Blocked shots25
1Giveaways2
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestNeil – Foligno – O'Brien9:08

    xG 1.15–0.15 (88%)attempts 18–5goals 1–0

  2. Alfredsson – Klinkhammer – Turris12:06

    xG 0.78–0.30 (72%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  3. Konopka – Greening – Condra5:16

    xG 0.08–0.33 (19%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Spezza – Michalek – Butler9:59

    xG 0.21–0.76 (21%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGonchar – Cowen11:11

    xG 0.95–0.27 (78%)attempts 17–8goals 1–0

  2. Phillips – Gilroy12:33

    xG 0.74–0.40 (65%)attempts 9–11goals 1–1

  3. Kuba – Karlsson15:59

    xG 0.56–1.10 (34%)attempts 20–16goals 0–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestSmithson – Kopecky – Goc10:28

    xG 0.79–0.32 (71%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  2. Barch – Santorelli – Skille3:18

    xG 0.37–0.06 (87%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  3. Samuelsson – Weiss – Bergenheim11:08

    xG 0.34–0.86 (29%)attempts 8–18goals 0–1

  4. Fleischmann – Wolski – Matthias8:36

    xG 0.22–0.74 (23%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeaver – Ellerby17:23

    xG 1.00–0.46 (69%)attempts 17–19goals 2–0

  2. Jovanovski – Strachan10:00

    xG 0.41–0.68 (38%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

  3. Campbell – Garrison15:44

    xG 0.62–1.14 (35%)attempts 14–19goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.4 xGOTT 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 64/100 · #405 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.38 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 53% of the time.

FLA winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).