Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 14, 2012·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Phoenix Coyotes 5, Vancouver Canucks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 52% of the time.

VAN winsPHX wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHX21321317533
VAN218115110443

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:18VANAlexandre BurrowsAssists: Jannik Hansen, Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.21 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:39VANRyan KeslerPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexandre Burrows · Snap, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 11:22PHXRostislav KleslaAssists: Antoine Vermette, Ray Whitney · Wrist, 0.31 xG1–2
  4. P1 16:20PHXShane DoanAssists: Antoine Vermette, Ray Whitney · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:58PHXOliver Ekman-LarssonPPAssists: Lauri Korpikoski, Ray Whitney · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 12:22VANDavid BoothPPAssists: Chris Higgins, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–3
  7. P2 18:41PHXGilbert BruleAssists: Taylor Pyatt, Keith Yandle · Deflected, 0.30 xG4–3
  8. P3 1:38PHXAntoine VermettePPGWGAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Shane Doan · Wrist, 0.23 xG5–3
  9. P3 12:11VANDan HamhuisAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.37 xG5–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 8:50PHXMichal Rozsival: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:35PHXTaylor Pyatt: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 6:48VANDale Weise: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  4. P2 10:36PHXRostislav Klesla: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P3 1:29VANKevin Bieksa: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHX00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← PHX attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Gordon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHXVAN
33Shots on goal43
3.4Expected goals3.2
47Shot attempts79
35Faceoffs won31
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
21Hits26
19Blocked shots9
4Giveaways3
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestWhitney – Doan – Vermette2:09

    xG 0.39–0.02 (95%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  2. Pouliot – Bissonnette – Boedker4:38

    xG 0.14–0.11 (55%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  3. Whitney – Vermette – Boedker2:25

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Pyatt – Gordon – Korpikoski11:49

    xG 0.10–0.28 (26%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlesla – Yandle2:21

    xG 0.43–0.07 (85%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  2. Rozsival – Schlemko5:23

    xG 0.10–0.02 (86%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Rozsival – Yandle14:21

    xG 0.61–0.60 (51%)attempts 10–16goals 1–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestPahlsson – Burrows – Hansen10:42

    xG 0.60–0.15 (80%)attempts 13–3goals 1–0

  2. Higgins – Kesler – Booth14:48

    xG 0.55–0.51 (52%)attempts 17–12goals 0–0

  3. Lapierre – Weise – Kassian7:08

    xG 0.10–0.24 (29%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Raymond12:52

    xG 0.29–0.69 (30%)attempts 17–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Tanev16:13

    xG 1.26–0.42 (75%)attempts 21–13goals 2–0

  2. Salo – Hamhuis3:40

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Salo – Gragnani10:47

    xG 0.28–0.25 (53%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.2 xGPHX 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANPHX

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it PHX. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #103 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.00 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
PHX 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 52% of the time.

VAN winsPHX wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − PHX), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).