Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 21, 2013·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Anaheim Ducks 5, Calgary Flames 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 51% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA3903212524
CGY2511416425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:06ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Toni Lydman, Corey Perry · Tip-in, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:23ANASaku KoivuAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Daniel Winnik · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P1 10:53ANADaniel WinnikAssists: Sheldon Souray, Saku Koivu · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–0
  4. P1 16:54CGYCurtis GlencrossPPAssists: Dennis Wideman, Alex Tanguay · Deflected, 0.20 xG3–1
  5. P1 19:34CGYAlex TanguayAssists: Jarome Iginla, Curtis Glencross · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P2 1:13CGYCurtis GlencrossPPAssists: Michael Cammalleri, Dennis Wideman · Deflected, 0.19 xG3–3
  7. P3 4:02ANADaniel WinnikAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Saku Koivu · Wrist, 0.38 xG4–3
  8. P3 11:15ANARyan GetzlafGWGAssists: Corey Perry, Kyle Palmieri · Wrist, 0.20 xG5–3
  9. P3 14:04CGYLee StempniakAssists: TJ Brodie, Roman Horak · Snap, 0.13 xG5–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 11:47CGYAlex Tanguay: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 16:15ANAToni Lydman: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:59ANABryan Allen: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 5:29ANACam Fowler: Holding2 min
  5. P3 6:46CGYRoman Horak: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACGY
24Shots on goal25
2.7Expected goals2.5
44Shot attempts58
37Faceoffs won28
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
17Hits17
17Blocked shots11
10Giveaways12
8Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Palmieri13:54

    xG 1.03–0.40 (72%)attempts 16–9goals 2–0

  2. Koivu – Winnik – Cogliano12:13

    xG 0.79–0.33 (71%)attempts 11–8goals 3–0

  3. Selanne – Ryan – Bonino11:31

    xG 0.41–0.34 (55%)attempts 6–18goals 0–0

  4. Beleskey – Smith-Pelly – Rakell7:04

    xG 0.19–0.40 (33%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSouray – Sbisa14:07

    xG 1.34–0.52 (72%)attempts 11–15goals 4–2

  2. Lydman – Beauchemin14:55

    xG 0.53–0.20 (73%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. Allen – Fowler17:40

    xG 0.63–0.92 (41%)attempts 13–20goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestStajan – Stempniak – Horak12:34

    xG 0.63–0.12 (84%)attempts 16–8goals 1–0

  2. Cammalleri – Backlund – Baertschi11:43

    xG 0.32–0.18 (64%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  3. Jackman – Comeau – Jones6:00

    xG 0.31–0.25 (56%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

  4. Iginla – Tanguay – Glencross13:35

    xG 0.40–1.42 (22%)attempts 12–16goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSarich – Brodie5:00

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Wideman – Giordano7:46

    xG 0.28–0.10 (73%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Wideman – Butler3:32

    xG 0.12–0.01 (92%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.5 xGANA 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #47 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.99 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 40% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 51% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).