Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 25, 2013·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Carolina Hurricanes 3, Buffalo Sabres 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 67% of the time.

BUF winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR014010318342
BUF010018113141

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P3 1:56BUFThomas VanekPPAssists: Jason Pominville, Christian Ehrhoff · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P3 3:31CARAlexander SeminPPAssists: Jordan Staal · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P3 15:10CARJay HarrisonGWGAssists: Eric Staal · Slap, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P3 19:34CARJeff SkinnerENAssists: Tim Gleason, Jay Harrison · Backhand, 0.77 xG3–1
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 0:56BUFJordan Leopold: Interference2 min
  2. P1 1:34CARJordan Staal: Interference2 min
  3. P1 10:27BUFSteve Ott: Elbowing2 min
  4. P1 10:27BUFSteve Ott: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 10:27CARTim Gleason: Instigator2 min
  6. P1 10:27CARTim Gleason: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 10:27CARTim Gleason: Misconduct10 min
  8. P1 16:32BUFThomas Vanek: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P1 16:32BUFThomas Vanek: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P1 17:01CARJeff Skinner: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P2 3:45CARJoni Pitkanen: Interference2 min
  12. P2 14:47CARJordan Staal: Holding2 min
  13. P3 1:37CARJordan Staal: Tripping2 min · PPG
  14. P3 2:50BUFMarcus Foligno: High sticking2 min · PPG
  15. P3 17:51BUFThomas Vanek: Cross checking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← CAR attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Hecht
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARBUF
42Shots on goal41
3.6Expected goals2.6
56Shot attempts54
42Faceoffs won23
5Power plays4
27Penalty minutes17
14Hits27
7Blocked shots4
9Giveaways10
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. Jokinen – LaRose – Bowman7:29

    xG 0.17–0.14 (54%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  2. Brent – Dwyer – Bowman2:06

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Dalpe – Skinner12:02

    xG 0.44–0.44 (50%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  4. Semin – Staal – Tlusty12:40

    xG 0.24–0.32 (43%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHarrison – Faulk3:32

    xG 0.33–0.04 (88%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Pitkanen – McBain16:37

    xG 0.68–0.47 (59%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  3. Corvo – Harrison6:14

    xG 0.24–0.17 (59%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Vanek – Hodgson12:36

    xG 0.72–0.52 (58%)attempts 19–10goals 0–0

  2. Hecht – Ott – Kaleta9:41

    xG 0.20–0.18 (52%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Stafford – Ennis – Foligno11:21

    xG 0.27–0.85 (24%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Sulzer12:54

    xG 0.29–0.23 (56%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Regehr – Sekera2:00

    xG 0.06–0.01 (88%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Leopold – Sekera15:13

    xG 0.76–0.79 (49%)attempts 18–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.6 xGCAR 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 49/100 · #357 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.60 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 67% of the time.

BUF winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).