Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 27, 2013·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 60% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI1601108125
TBL3130528526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:59PHISean CouturierAssists: Max Talbot · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:34TBLTeddy PurcellPPAssists: Steven Stamkos, Martin St. Louis · Snap, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:10TBLEric BrewerGWGAssists: Teddy Purcell, Martin St. Louis · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:55TBLVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Martin St. Louis, Sami Salo · Slap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:58TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Adam Hall, Sami Salo · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–4
  6. P3 12:29TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Teddy Purcell, Martin St. Louis · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–5
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 5:09TBLVincent Lecavalier: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 5:09PHILuke Schenn: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 7:15TBLB.J. Crombeen: Holding2 min
  4. P1 7:15TBLB.J. Crombeen: Interference2 min
  5. P1 7:15TBLB.J. Crombeen: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 7:15PHIWayne Simmonds: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 13:51PHIWayne Simmonds: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  8. P1 16:27PHIClaude Giroux: Hooking2 min
  9. P1 18:11PHIMike Knuble: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P1 19:47TBLBenoit Pouliot: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 3:26TBLEric Brewer: Cross checking2 min
  12. P2 17:35TBLSteven Stamkos: Cross checking2 min
  13. P3 10:27PHIBraydon Coburn: Holding2 min
  14. P3 13:16PHIBruno Gervais: Interference2 min
  15. P3 16:52PHIWayne Simmonds: Misconduct10 min
  16. P3 17:43TBLDana Tyrell: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
43% to win57% to win
← PHI attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hall won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHITBL
25Shots on goal26
2.2Expected goals1.7
67Shot attempts40
34Faceoffs won30
6Power plays5
27Penalty minutes19
26Hits27
8Blocked shots26
6Giveaways7
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrière – Schenn – McGinn9:33

    xG 0.45–0.16 (74%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  2. Knuble – Fedotenko – Sestito3:25

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Knuble – Fedotenko – Talbot2:42

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Simmonds – Read10:02

    xG 0.43–0.46 (48%)attempts 12–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCoburn – Gervais11:11

    xG 0.58–0.43 (57%)attempts 18–7goals 1–1

  2. Gervais – Schenn2:20

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Timonen – Schenn10:29

    xG 0.14–0.17 (45%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Malone – Stamkos2:39

    xG 0.11–0.02 (85%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

  2. Lecavalier – Purcell – Conacher2:29

    xG 0.08–0.04 (66%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Pouliot – Pyatt – Tyrell7:20

    xG 0.08–0.17 (33%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. St. Louis – Purcell – Stamkos7:54

    xG 0.28–0.38 (43%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Salo – Hedman13:15

    xG 0.30–0.36 (45%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  2. Lee – Aulie11:16

    xG 0.25–0.45 (36%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1

  3. Brewer – Carle12:06

    xG 0.28–0.56 (33%)attempts 9–18goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 1.7 xGPHI 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 34/100 · #506 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.14 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 60% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).