Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 17, 2013·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 63% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT211011213435
BUF1719117333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:35PITPascal DupuisAssists: Brooks Orpik, Chris Kunitz · Slap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:27PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Chris Kunitz · Wrist, 0.52 xG2–0
  3. P1 6:32BUFCody HodgsonAssists: Christian Ehrhoff, Thomas Vanek · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:16BUFThomas VanekPPAssists: Christian Ehrhoff, Tyler Ennis · Deflected, 0.28 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:17BUFSteve OttAssists: Nathan Gerbe, Jochen Hecht · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 7:06PITPascal DupuisAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Slap, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:56PITPaul MartinGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Pascal Dupuis · Slap, 0.04 xG4–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:08BUFTyler Myers: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 3:52BUFJason Pominville: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 7:38BUFMike Weber: Interference2 min
  4. P1 7:38PITEvgeni Malkin: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 15:47PITJames Neal: Interference2 min
  6. P1 0:00BUFRobyn Regehr: Interference2 min
  7. P2 7:39PITSidney Crosby: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 7:39PITTanner Glass: Delaying game face off violation2 min
  9. P2 11:50BUFJason Pominville: Holding2 min
  10. P3 2:22BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 2:22PITTanner Glass: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 13:42PITChris Kunitz: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 0:00BUFSteve Ott: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Hodgson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBUF
35Shots on goal33
4.3Expected goals5.1
62Shot attempts60
34Faceoffs won34
4Power plays4
15Penalty minutes25
18Hits29
18Blocked shots13
11Giveaways12
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestAdams – Glass – Vitale2:32

    xG 0.26–0.02 (94%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Crosby – Neal2:17

    xG 0.30–0.09 (76%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Kennedy – Sutter – Bennett5:57

    xG 0.35–0.25 (58%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Neal – Bennett2:18

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Letang6:02

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Niskanen – Bortuzzo3:20

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Niskanen – Letang10:32

    xG 0.62–0.74 (46%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestStafford – Ennis – Foligno11:13

    xG 1.35–0.36 (79%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

  2. Pominville – Vanek – Hodgson11:38

    xG 1.05–0.57 (65%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  3. Hecht – Ott – Gerbe8:38

    xG 0.49–0.13 (79%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  4. McCormick – Kaleta – Scott3:04

    xG 0.02–0.26 (6%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Sulzer14:53

    xG 1.65–0.92 (64%)attempts 19–15goals 2–2

  2. Regehr – Myers9:40

    xG 0.38–0.13 (75%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Leopold – Weber12:03

    xG 0.51–0.68 (43%)attempts 7–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 5.1 xGPIT 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #55 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.48 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 63% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).