Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 10, 2013·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 2, Philadelphia Flyers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 86% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF1401016220
PHI21211006328

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:31PHISimon GagnePPAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Ilya Bryzgalov · Snap, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:47PHIMax TalbotSHAssists: Ruslan Fedotenko · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P1 11:43BUFBrian FlynnAssists: Kevin Porter, Andrej Sekera · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 0:17PHIClaude GirouxPPGWGAssists: Kimmo Timonen · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:32BUFJochen HechtSHAssists: Steve Ott · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 3:29BUFRobyn Regehr: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:24PHIWayne Simmonds: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 15:54BUFMike Weber: Instigator2 min
  4. P1 15:54BUFMike Weber: Fighting5 min · PPG
  5. P1 15:54BUFMike Weber: Misconduct10 min
  6. P1 15:54PHIWayne Simmonds: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 18:15BUFJohn Scott: Misconduct10 min
  8. P1 19:01BUFJochen Hecht: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 9:46BUFTJ Brennan: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P2 16:48PHIZac Rinaldo: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P2 16:48BUFSteve Ott: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  12. P2 19:48BUFSteve Ott: Interference2 min
  13. P3 2:11PHIZac Rinaldo: Charging2 min
  14. P3 2:11PHIZac Rinaldo: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 4:01BUFDrew Stafford: High sticking2 min
  16. P3 13:15PHILuke Schenn: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
43% to win57% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Hodgson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
20Shots on goal28
1.2Expected goals3.3
41Shot attempts55
27Faceoffs won25
3Power plays6
39Penalty minutes23
19Hits15
17Blocked shots15
5Giveaways3
7Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPorter – Foligno – Flynn7:29

    xG 0.19–0.04 (84%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Hecht – Ott – Stafford3:34

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Ott – Gerbe – Ennis2:34

    xG 0.03–0.27 (11%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Vanek – Hodgson9:26

    xG 0.45–0.89 (34%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Brennan2:29

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Regehr – Sekera9:23

    xG 0.25–0.21 (55%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  3. Ehrhoff – Myers12:35

    xG 0.42–0.39 (52%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrière – Simmonds – Schenn6:52

    xG 0.75–0.04 (95%)attempts 14–2goals 0–0

  2. Hartnell – Giroux – Voracek9:29

    xG 0.26–0.01 (95%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  3. Gagne – Read – Couturier8:05

    xG 0.02–0.05 (33%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Fedotenko – Talbot – Rinaldo6:46

    xG 0.08–0.49 (14%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Schenn10:12

    xG 0.85–0.18 (83%)attempts 16–6goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Grossmann13:19

    xG 0.78–0.49 (62%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  3. Meszaros – Schenn2:29

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.3 xGBUF 1.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 35/100 · #502 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.17 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 86% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).