Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 16, 2013·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Ottawa Senators 4, Buffalo Sabres 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 50% of the time.

BUF winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
OTT0103150613434
BUF2100911304336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:52BUFMike WeberAssists: Ville Leino, Steve Ott · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:16BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Nathan Gerbe, Jordan Leopold · Slap, 0.21 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:03OTTPatrick WierciochAssists: Sergei Gonchar, Kyle Turris · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:14OTTChris PhillipsAssists: Jim O'Brien · Slap, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:57OTTKyle TurrisAssists: Guillaume Latendresse, Patrick Wiercioch · Wrap-around, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 12:06BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Christian Ehrhoff, Jochen Hecht · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:54OTTKyle TurrisPPGWGAssists: Daniel Alfredsson, Sergei Gonchar · Slap, 0.20 xG4–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:55BUFMarcus Foligno: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:49BUFCody Hodgson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 18:08BUFNathan Gerbe: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 18:08OTTChris Neil: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 0:52OTTColin Greening: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 0:52BUFSteve Ott: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 10:44OTTSergei Gonchar: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 19:45BUFRobyn Regehr: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 19:45OTTChris Neil: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 1:56OTTErik Condra: Closing hand on puck2 min
  11. P3 16:25OTTPatrick Wiercioch: Tripping2 min
  12. OT 2:16BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← OTT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ennis won the faceoff against Turris
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTBUF
34Shots on goal36
2.7Expected goals2.7
66Shot attempts55
35Faceoffs won30
3Power plays3
15Penalty minutes15
17Hits14
12Blocked shots18
6Giveaways9
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestCondra – Silfverberg – Zibanejad4:32

    xG 0.29–0.01 (96%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Regin – Kassian – O'Brien2:15

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  3. Alfredsson – Latendresse – Smith4:09

    xG 0.16–0.23 (41%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

  4. Alfredsson – Latendresse – Turris9:21

    xG 0.30–0.38 (44%)attempts 14–9goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhillips – Gryba17:25

    xG 0.61–0.36 (63%)attempts 19–16goals 2–1

  2. Benoit – Methot7:32

    xG 0.25–0.06 (80%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Benoit – Wiercioch3:18

    xG 0.07–0.16 (29%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHecht – Stafford – Gerbe8:33

    xG 0.50–0.14 (79%)attempts 8–7goals 2–1

  2. Porter – Foligno – Flynn10:09

    xG 0.36–0.27 (57%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Ott – Leino – Ennis11:21

    xG 0.36–0.32 (53%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  4. Pominville – Vanek – Hodgson9:42

    xG 0.09–0.34 (21%)attempts 5–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Myers14:30

    xG 0.58–0.43 (57%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

  2. Leopold – Weber9:44

    xG 0.36–0.23 (61%)attempts 10–9goals 2–1

  3. Leopold – Myers2:19

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.7 xGOTT 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #58 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.44 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 50% of the time.

BUF winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).