Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 27, 2013·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Carolina Hurricanes 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 74% of the time.

PIT winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR0531609330
PIT111214510835

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:49PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: James Neal, Marc-Andre Fleury · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:10PITJames NealAssists: Kris Letang, Chris Kunitz · Snap, 0.20 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:30CARKevin WestgarthAssists: Jiri Tlusty, Eric Staal · Backhand, 0.20 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:10PITJussi JokinenAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Jarome Iginla · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:14CARTuomo RuutuAssists: Jordan Staal, Patrick Dwyer · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:51CARKevin WestgarthAssists: Jamie McBain, Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:36PITJames NealPPGWGAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Paul Martin · Snap, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 4:14PITJames NealAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Chris Kunitz · Snap, 0.08 xG3–5
  9. P3 5:24PITBrenden MorrowAssists: Brandon Sutter, Matt Cooke · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–6
  10. P3 15:43PITMatt CookeAssists: Brenden Morrow, Paul Martin · Wrist, 0.26 xG3–7
  11. P3 19:11PITJussi JokinenAssists: Jarome Iginla, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–8
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:32CAREric Staal: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:04PITPaul Martin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 15:57PITDouglas Murray: Holding2 min
  4. P2 1:04PITJarome Iginla: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 2:08CARTuomo Ruutu: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 0:45CARJared Staal: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  7. P3 10:56PITBrenden Morrow: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← CAR attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Jokinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARPIT
30Shots on goal35
2.2Expected goals3.8
57Shot attempts58
25Faceoffs won38
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
23Hits18
8Blocked shots15
3Giveaways5
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Tlusty – Westgarth6:36

    xG 0.72–0.27 (73%)attempts 9–4goals 2–0

  2. Ruutu – Staal – Staal7:45

    xG 0.38–0.37 (51%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  3. Staal – Tlusty – Staal2:21

    xG 0.03–0.02 (63%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Ruutu – Dwyer – Staal2:03

    xG 0.25–0.25 (50%)attempts 5–2goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcBain – Sanguinetti13:20

    xG 0.85–0.80 (52%)attempts 20–13goals 0–1

  2. Gleason – Sanguinetti3:44

    xG 0.23–0.33 (41%)attempts 3–5goals 1–0

  3. Bergeron – McBain7:28

    xG 0.18–0.51 (26%)attempts 9–6goals 1–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Neal7:37

    xG 1.32–0.12 (92%)attempts 22–6goals 2–0

  2. Cooke – Morrow – Sutter9:48

    xG 0.65–0.30 (69%)attempts 8–13goals 2–1

  3. Iginla – Dupuis – Jokinen8:11

    xG 0.51–0.33 (61%)attempts 6–7goals 2–1

  4. Adams – Glass – Kennedy8:41

    xG 0.18–0.50 (26%)attempts 4–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang5:06

    xG 0.78–0.30 (73%)attempts 11–2goals 3–1

  2. Eaton – Letang9:18

    xG 0.54–0.10 (85%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  3. Murray – Martin4:12

    xG 0.40–0.08 (84%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.8 xGCAR 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #116 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.72 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 74% of the time.

PIT winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).