Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 10, 2013·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Florida Panthers 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 69% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA061817221
TBL2921039728

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:13TBLMartin St. LouisAssists: Steven Stamkos, Teddy Purcell · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:54TBLSteven StamkosSHAssists: Martin St. Louis, Victor Hedman · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:59FLABrad BoyesPPAssists: Brian Campbell, Tomas Fleischmann · Wrist, 0.33 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:39TBLSteven StamkosGWGAssists: Matt Carle, Ryan Malone · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P2 15:51TBLOndrej PalatAssists: Alex Killorn, Ben Bishop · Slap, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P3 3:48FLAJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Scott Gomez, Kris Versteeg · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–4
  7. P3 6:38TBLValtteri FilppulaPPAssists: Matt Carle, Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–5
  8. P3 9:14TBLValtteri FilppulaAssists: Teddy Purcell, Sami Salo · Backhand, 0.04 xG2–6
  9. P3 12:25TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Sami Salo, Teddy Purcell · Slap, 0.03 xG2–7
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 6:12FLAMike Weaver: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 11:55TBLRichard Panik: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 19:40TBLVictor Hedman: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 4:31TBLPierre-Cedric Labrie: Interference2 min
  5. P2 5:18FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Holding2 min
  6. P2 7:45FLAJesse Winchester: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 13:11FLAErik Gudbranson: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 13:11TBLB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 4:57FLAMarcel Goc: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  10. P3 10:56FLAJesse Winchester: Hooking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 13:22TBLPierre-Cedric Labrie: Holding2 min
  12. P3 16:44TBLVictor Hedman: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 16:44FLAScottie Upshall: Cross checking2 min
  14. P3 17:45TBLMatt Carle: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
48% to win52% to win
← FLA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Goc won the faceoff against Stamkos
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLATBL
21Shots on goal28
1.3Expected goals2.2
39Shot attempts53
22Faceoffs won37
5Power plays5
17Penalty minutes17
15Hits27
16Blocked shots9
3Giveaways8
7Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestGomez – Versteeg – Huberdeau5:09

    xG 0.25–0.03 (89%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Kopecky – Matthias – Winchester5:39

    xG 0.21–0.02 (93%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Gomez – Upshall – Crabb4:38

    xG 0.02–0.09 (14%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  4. Goc – Versteeg – Huberdeau7:06

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Campbell – Gilbert9:48

    xG 0.20–0.16 (56%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  2. Weaver – Kulikov11:28

    xG 0.29–0.31 (49%)attempts 6–5goals 1–1

  3. Whitney – Gudbranson10:46

    xG 0.04–0.23 (16%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestPurcell – Johnson – Palat6:08

    xG 0.39–0.03 (93%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0

  2. St. Louis – Malone – Stamkos10:53

    xG 0.34–0.18 (65%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  3. Filppula – Killorn – Panik12:02

    xG 0.25–0.31 (45%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  4. Crombeen – Thompson – Labrie6:08

    xG 0.01–0.10 (12%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalo – Hedman11:03

    xG 0.54–0.05 (91%)attempts 17–3goals 1–0

  2. Brewer – Sustr13:09

    xG 0.12–0.12 (51%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Carle – Gudas13:02

    xG 0.28–0.35 (45%)attempts 8–10goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.2 xGFLA 1.3 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #538 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.93 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 69% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).