Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 16, 2013·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Buffalo Sabres 2, Toronto Maple Leafs 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 57% of the time.

TOR winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF06012217235
TOR2101715422

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:45TORJames van RiemsdykAssists: Cody Franson, Jake Gardiner · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:35TORJames van RiemsdykPPAssists: Cody Franson, Dion Phaneuf · Tip-in, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 11:49TORNikolay KuleminGWGAssists: Mason Raymond, Paul Ranger · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P3 2:15BUFJamie McBainAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Marcus Foligno · Slap, 0.05 xG1–3
  5. P3 6:11BUFTyler EnnisPPAssists: Matt Moulson, Cody Hodgson · Snap, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:56TORMason RaymondPPAssists: Trevor Smith, David Clarkson · Slap, 0.10 xG2–4
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 13:27BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 4:12BUFSteve Ott: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 4:12TORDavid Clarkson: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 5:11TORJay McClement: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 8:43TORPeter Holland: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 18:15TORCarl Gunnarsson: Interference2 min
  7. P2 18:15BUFSteve Ott: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P3 5:34TORColton Orr: Roughing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 5:34TORColton Orr: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 5:34TORFrazer McLaren: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 5:34TORFrazer McLaren: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 5:34TORFrazer McLaren: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 5:34BUFCody McCormick: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 5:34BUFJohn Scott: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 5:34BUFJohn Scott: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 5:34BUFJohn Scott: Roughing2 min
  17. P3 5:34TORDion Phaneuf: Cross checking2 min
  18. P3 17:14BUFVille Leino: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hodgson won the faceoff against Smith
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFTOR
35Shots on goal22
1.8Expected goals2.2
65Shot attempts46
26Faceoffs won39
3Power plays2
27Penalty minutes39
26Hits29
10Blocked shots17
5Giveaways8
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Flynn – Girgensons9:16

    xG 0.21–0.09 (71%)attempts 11–3goals 1–1

  2. McCormick – Scott – Tropp5:22

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Ott – Leino – Ennis11:43

    xG 0.52–0.77 (40%)attempts 14–14goals 0–1

  4. Moulson – Stafford – Hodgson16:19

    xG 0.24–0.55 (30%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Pysyk15:43

    xG 0.46–0.25 (65%)attempts 16–10goals 0–1

  2. Tallinder – Myers13:45

    xG 0.34–0.46 (43%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  3. McBain – Ristolainen14:35

    xG 0.25–0.70 (26%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestLupul – Clarkson – Smith15:19

    xG 0.80–0.33 (71%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  2. McClement – Raymond – Kulemin11:41

    xG 0.44–0.11 (81%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  3. Smithson – Orr – McLaren5:03

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Kessel – van Riemsdyk – Holland9:34

    xG 0.29–0.53 (35%)attempts 9–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRanger – Fraser3:54

    xG 0.50–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Phaneuf – Gunnarsson13:13

    xG 0.56–0.19 (75%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

  3. Ranger – Gardiner3:47

    xG 0.20–0.02 (90%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 2.2 xGBUF 1.8 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 63/100 · #405 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.90 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 57% of the time.

TOR winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).