Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 10, 2013·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Ottawa Senators 1, Buffalo Sabres 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

BUF winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
OTT11109013033136
BUF01111806014236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:25OTTMilan MichalekAssists: Cory Conacher · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 13:15BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Christian Ehrhoff · Slap, 0.11 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Matt Moulson scored
  2. 2. OTT Erik Karlsson stopped
  3. 3. BUF Tyler Ennis stopped
  4. 4. OTT Mika Zibanejad scored
  5. 5. BUF Cody Hodgson stopped
  6. 6. OTT Jason Spezza stopped
  7. 7. BUF Drew Stafford stopped
  8. 8. OTT Bobby Ryan stopped
  9. 9. BUF Luke Adam stopped
  10. 10. OTT Cory Conacher stopped
  11. 11. BUF Brian Flynn scored
  12. 12. OTT Kyle Turris scored
  13. 13. BUF Steve Ott scored
  14. 14. OTT Milan Michalek scored
  15. 15. BUF Matt D'Agostini stopped
  16. 16. OTT Patrick Wiercioch stopped
  17. 17. BUF Marcus Foligno stopped
  18. 18. OTT Clarke MacArthur stopped
  19. 19. BUF Zemgus Girgensons scored
  20. 20. OTT Erik Condra stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 9:49BUFMatt Moulson: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 12:03BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 5:25BUFLuke Adam: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 9:14OTTErik Karlsson: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 15:30OTTJason Spezza: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 18:57OTTMika Zibanejad: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
48% to win52% to win
← OTT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ennis won the faceoff against Turris
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTBUF
36Shots on goal36
2.7Expected goals3.1
70Shot attempts58
33Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
13Hits18
9Blocked shots17
5Giveaways4
4Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestTurris – Conacher – Zibanejad2:28

    xG 0.36–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Spezza – MacArthur – Ryan10:10

    xG 0.41–0.46 (47%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  3. Neil – Greening – Zibanejad3:22

    xG 0.07–0.19 (25%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  4. Neil – Greening – Smith5:37

    xG 0.15–0.34 (31%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhillips – Corvo12:38

    xG 0.65–0.39 (62%)attempts 15–9goals 1–1

  2. Wiercioch – Cowen11:42

    xG 0.67–0.47 (59%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Cowen2:11

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMoulson – Ennis – Girgensons12:26

    xG 0.88–0.33 (73%)attempts 18–13goals 1–1

  2. McCormick – Scott – Flynn4:08

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

  3. D'Agostini – Hodgson – Adam11:53

    xG 0.14–0.54 (21%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  4. Ott – Stafford – Foligno11:21

    xG 0.24–0.70 (25%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – McBain16:53

    xG 0.86–0.50 (63%)attempts 19–14goals 1–0

  2. Tallinder – Myers15:32

    xG 0.50–0.70 (42%)attempts 10–21goals 0–1

  3. McNabb – Pysyk10:24

    xG 0.25–0.49 (34%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.1 xGOTT 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #921 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

BUF winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).