Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 27, 2013·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Buffalo Sabres 3, Toronto Maple Leafs 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 62% of the time.

TOR winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF21505113020335
TOR010317011041442

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:01BUFMatt MoulsonAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Jamie McBain · Wrist, 0.39 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:53BUFJohn ScottAssists: Matt Ellis · Wrist, 0.36 xG2–0
  3. P2 11:38TORJake GardinerAssists: Phil Kessel, Cody Franson · Slap, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 16:25TORPeter HollandAssists: Mason Raymond, Cody Franson · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:43TORPhil KesselPPAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Dion Phaneuf · Snap, 0.43 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:35BUFSteve OttPPAssists: Matt Moulson, Tyler Myers · Wrist, 0.39 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. TOR Phil Kessel stopped
  2. 2. BUF Matt Moulson stopped
  3. 3. TOR Joffrey Lupul scored
  4. 4. BUF Tyler Ennis stopped
  5. 5. TOR James van Riemsdyk stopped
  6. 6. BUF Zemgus Girgensons stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 1:09BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Interference2 min
  2. P2 19:16BUFJohn Scott: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P3 2:19BUFLinus Omark: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 19:09TORDion Phaneuf: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. OT 5:00TORDion Phaneuf: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ennis won the faceoff against Kadri
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFTOR
35Shots on goal42
4.4Expected goals5.2
60Shot attempts71
31Faceoffs won30
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes12
22Hits26
16Blocked shots11
13Giveaways10
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOtt – Stafford – Flynn11:49

    xG 0.86–0.41 (68%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

  2. Moulson – Ennis – Girgensons14:38

    xG 1.34–1.42 (49%)attempts 20–15goals 1–0

  3. Omark – Leino – Foligno8:14

    xG 0.10–0.41 (19%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  4. Ellis – D'Agostini – Scott11:07

    xG 0.44–1.17 (27%)attempts 8–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – McBain14:20

    xG 1.35–0.66 (67%)attempts 19–10goals 1–1

  2. Tallinder – Myers19:01

    xG 1.32–1.05 (56%)attempts 16–19goals 0–1

  3. Ehrhoff – McBain3:10

    xG 0.11–0.23 (33%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – van Riemsdyk – Kadri14:13

    xG 1.47–0.39 (79%)attempts 20–9goals 1–0

  2. Lupul – Raymond – Holland12:37

    xG 1.52–0.47 (76%)attempts 18–8goals 1–1

  3. Smithson – Orr – D'Amigo4:31

    xG 0.11–0.07 (62%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. McClement – Clarkson – Kulemin14:57

    xG 0.35–1.20 (23%)attempts 10–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRanger – Rielly15:31

    xG 0.76–0.12 (87%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Phaneuf – Gunnarsson16:08

    xG 1.32–1.17 (53%)attempts 15–18goals 0–0

  3. Franson – Gardiner18:23

    xG 1.25–1.33 (48%)attempts 18–17goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 5.2 xGBUF 4.4 xG
0123456P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #109 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.26 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 62% of the time.

TOR winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).