Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 28, 2013·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Detroit Red Wings 4, Florida Panthers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 74% of the time.

FLA winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DET27011213431
FLA012210111333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:47DETDaniel AlfredssonPPAssists: Niklas Kronwall, Pavel Datsyuk · Snap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:29DETHenrik ZetterbergPPAssists: Pavel Datsyuk · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 12:52FLASean BergenheimPPAssists: Brian Campbell, Aleksander Barkov · Backhand, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:59FLANick BjugstadUnassisted · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–2
  5. P3 0:42DETBrendan SmithAssists: Kyle Quincey · Slap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:20DETGustav NyquistGWGAssists: Jakub Kindl, Tomas Tatar · Wrist, 0.26 xG4–2
  7. P3 4:27FLASean BergenheimAssists: Dylan Olsen, Marcel Goc · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 3:35FLADmitry Kulikov: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 4:37DETHenrik Zetterberg: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 8:54DETTodd Bertuzzi: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 12:45FLAAlexander Petrovic: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 14:51DETKyle Quincey: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 16:07FLASean Bergenheim: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 1:37FLATomas Kopecky: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 6:05FLANick Bjugstad: Boarding2 min
  9. P2 12:16DETBrendan Smith: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P3 5:04DETBrian Lashoff: Holding2 min
  11. P3 14:00DETKyle Quincey: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
48% to win52% to win
← DET attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zetterberg won the faceoff against Bjugstad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETFLA
31Shots on goal33
1.7Expected goals2.9
45Shot attempts70
32Faceoffs won34
5Power plays6
12Penalty minutes10
18Hits37
22Blocked shots12
1Giveaways6
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestAndersson – Nyquist – Tatar6:26

    xG 0.54–0.19 (74%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Alfredsson – Zetterberg – Abdelkader11:39

    xG 0.26–0.17 (61%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Cleary – Miller – Glendening5:43

    xG 0.13–0.17 (42%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Bertuzzi – Datsyuk – Jurco8:34

    xG 0.16–0.42 (28%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKindl – Lashoff5:23

    xG 0.36–0.04 (89%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  2. Kronwall – Smith11:08

    xG 0.36–0.24 (59%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Quincey – Smith3:59

    xG 0.19–0.11 (63%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestFleischmann – Bjugstad – Huberdeau11:22

    xG 0.34–0.15 (69%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  2. Boyes – Bergenheim – Barkov8:15

    xG 0.40–0.31 (56%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Kopecky – Goc – Matthias7:49

    xG 0.19–0.23 (45%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Gomez – Hayes – Shore4:59

    xG 0.17–0.45 (27%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Campbell – Gilbert14:34

    xG 0.26–0.24 (52%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Olsen – Petrovic8:52

    xG 0.50–0.58 (47%)attempts 9–10goals 2–1

  3. Weaver – Kulikov10:56

    xG 0.24–0.37 (39%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.9 xGDET 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLADET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #262 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.67 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 74% of the time.

FLA winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).