Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 2, 2014·Pepsi Center, Denver

Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Colorado Avalanche 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 75% of the time.

COL winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL113210011334
COL29013413635

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:49TBLTom PyattAssists: Teddy Purcell, Sami Salo · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:19COLTyson BarrieAssists: Paul Stastny, Nathan MacKinnon · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:01COLRyan O'ReillyAssists: PA Parenteau, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:40TBLNate ThompsonAssists: Michael Kostka, Matt Carle · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:37TBLNate ThompsonAssists: Michael Kostka · Wrist, 0.21 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:12COLNick HoldenPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. P3 16:05COLErik JohnsonGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:06COLNick HoldenENAssists: Max Talbot · Backhand, 0.42 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:53COLPaul StastnyENAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.63 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 13:47COLMatt Duchene: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 18:32TBLVladislav Namestnikov: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P3 3:31TBLSami Salo: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 7:29TBLVictor Hedman: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 9:55TBLAlex Killorn: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 16:54COLJan Hejda: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
48% to win52% to win
← TBL attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Duchene won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLCOL
34Shots on goal35
3.0Expected goals4.7
54Shot attempts66
27Faceoffs won29
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
12Hits18
19Blocked shots9
2Giveaways9
5Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKucherov – Namestnikov – Brown6:52

    xG 1.03–0.27 (79%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  2. Pyatt – Purcell – Killorn10:42

    xG 0.56–0.39 (59%)attempts 15–7goals 1–2

  3. Malone – Thompson – Brown2:31

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–1

  4. St. Louis – Johnson – Palat12:29

    xG 0.36–0.72 (33%)attempts 7–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Barberio8:55

    xG 0.81–0.33 (71%)attempts 14–8goals 0–0

  2. Carle – Gudas5:41

    xG 0.51–0.13 (80%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  3. Salo – Brewer2:40

    xG 0.41–0.05 (89%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestParenteau – O'Reilly – Duchene11:36

    xG 1.45–0.09 (94%)attempts 20–4goals 1–0

  2. Bordeleau – McLeod – Cliche5:39

    xG 0.44–0.21 (68%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Stastny – Landeskog – MacKinnon12:43

    xG 0.50–0.72 (41%)attempts 9–17goals 1–0

  4. Talbot – Mitchell – McGinn9:38

    xG 0.06–0.96 (6%)attempts 5–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHejda – Johnson15:51

    xG 1.28–0.58 (69%)attempts 19–10goals 1–1

  2. Hejda – Holden2:42

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Guenin – Barrie14:25

    xG 0.69–0.96 (42%)attempts 10–19goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.7 xGTBL 3.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #102 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.13 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 75% of the time.

COL winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).