Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 9, 2014·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit

Tampa Bay Lightning 4, Detroit Red Wings 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 67% of the time.

DET winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TBL1122807031430
DET181316030320

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:14DETJohan FranzenPPAssists: Niklas Kronwall, Gustav Nyquist · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:53TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Ryan Callahan · Slap, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:19TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Ryan Callahan · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:02TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Ondrej Palat · Slap, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P2 11:37DETDarren HelmPPAssists: Johan Franzen, Niklas Kronwall · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 8:49DETGustav NyquistAssists: Jonathan Ericsson · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. DET Gustav Nyquist stopped
  2. 2. TBL Ryan Callahan scored
  3. 3. DET Tomas Tatar stopped
  4. 4. TBL Matt Carle stopped
  5. 5. DET Darren Helm stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 6:10TBLRyan Callahan: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:59TBLBen Bishop: Interference2 min
  3. P1 11:16DETKyle Quincey: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P1 11:25DETLuke Glendening: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P1 16:20DETDrew Miller: Interference2 min
  6. P1 19:02TBLRadko Gudas: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 3:41DETRiley Sheahan: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 10:34TBLCedric Paquette: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P2 12:48DETKyle Quincey: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
46% to win54% to win
← TBL attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Zetterberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLDET
30Shots on goal20
2.3Expected goals1.5
50Shot attempts44
25Faceoffs won32
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
16Hits26
16Blocked shots10
2Giveaways11
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestJohnson – Palat – Kucherov10:45

    xG 0.84–0.14 (86%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  2. Filppula – Callahan – Stamkos13:33

    xG 0.63–0.31 (67%)attempts 17–6goals 1–1

  3. Morrow – Boyle – Brown7:30

    xG 0.09–0.05 (65%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Namestnikov – Paquette – Drouin8:42

    xG 0.17–0.13 (56%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarle – Stralman17:24

    xG 0.86–0.21 (80%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Garrison – Gudas11:36

    xG 0.38–0.27 (59%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Brewer – Gudas3:35

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. Abdelkader – Tatar – Sheahan10:24

    xG 0.02–0.02 (54%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Cleary – Helm – Nestrasil5:48

    xG 0.13–0.14 (47%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Miller – Andersson – Glendening10:05

    xG 0.20–0.43 (32%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

  4. Zetterberg – Franzen – Nyquist12:16

    xG 0.23–0.99 (19%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Quincey – Kindl9:57

    xG 0.16–0.17 (49%)attempts 12–8goals 0–1

  2. Kindl – Smith2:39

    xG 0.02–0.09 (18%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Kronwall – Ericsson14:27

    xG 0.11–0.26 (30%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 1.5 xGTBL 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #165 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.13 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 67% of the time.

DET winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).